Abu Muqawama: Post

Abu Muqawama retains its autonomy and the views and beliefs expressed within the blog do not reflect those of CNAS. Abu Muqawama retains the right to delete comments that include words that incite violence; are predatory, hateful, or intended to intimidate or harass; or degrade people on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. In summary, don't be a jerk.

Sageman vs. Hoffman (and COIN vs. CT)

Our cousins across the Atlantic drew our attention to the growing feud between terrorism scholars Bruce Hoffman and Mark Sageman:
You no longer need a subscription to Foreign Affairs (or an Athens password) to
read about the feud between
Bruce Hoffman and Marc Sageman regarding the nature of the jihadist threat. First there was Hoffman’s takedown in the current issue of Foreign Affairs, in which he accused Sageman of “a fundamental misreading of the Al Qaeda threat.” Sageman’s rebuttal, in which he accuses Hoffman of a “gross misrepresentation”, is on the way. But thanks to the NYT Week in Review, we’re all treated to a little preview of what Sageman will have to say. Along with some trans-Atlantic commentary on the feud and a summary of why this matters beyond the realm of the ivory tower.

Charlie tends to come down with Hoffman on this one, if only because she's quite certain that leaving what's left of AQ(C) to re-group in Pakistan's tribal regions is a recipe for disaster. Sageman may be right that the organization has diminished capacity and weak leadership, but there's no reason to assume things will remain that way (especially if things in FATA continue their downward trend).

But the good folks at Kings also highlight a crucial difference in CT approaches in Europe and the US. From the NYT:
France, Spain and Italy, for example, pour resources and manpower into
investigations at home — from studying radicalization and wiretapping suspicious
individuals to infiltrating mosques and community centers. These countries also
track movements of suspicious individuals abroad and networks with both
local and foreign connections. Terrorist-related cases fall under the
authority of special investigative superjudges who have access to all classified
intelligence, and can use much of the information in trials.

As the Pentagon debates the lexicon of "irregular warfare" (not Charlie's favorite), let's also start thinking about how to link robust, long-term COIN and CT strategies. We're gonna need both.
Al Qaeda, COIN CT

16 comments

Add your comment

CNAS retains the right to delete comments that include words that incite violence; are predatory, hateful, or intended to intimidate or harass; or degrade people on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. In summary, don't be a jerk.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <hr><blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Search