Abu Muqawama: Post

Abu Muqawama retains its autonomy and the views and beliefs expressed within the blog do not reflect those of CNAS. Abu Muqawama retains the right to delete comments that include words that incite violence; are predatory, hateful, or intended to intimidate or harass; or degrade people on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. In summary, don't be a jerk.

And then?

Michael Slackman had a good article in the New York Times today about an English-language program the USG quietly started in 2004:
Ms. Yousef picked up her new language and thinking skills as part of Access, an after school English language program that is a small, almost invisible corner of the United States Department of State’s multibillion-dollar budget. It is a low profile, delayed-impact program that aims to promote change and understanding from the bottom up. Since its inception in 2004, it has taught 32,000 students in 50 countries. Access arrived in Egypt about two years ago and 182 teenagers from all over the country, Christians and Muslims, young men and young women, have graduated from the program. The only requirement is that they come from poor families.
First off, I am a huge fan of these kinds of programs. They strike me as more effective COIN than most of the capture/kill missions I have been on in Iraq and Afghanistan. As far as information operations go, I would argue they are invaluable to any kind of long-term strategy. But toward the end of the article, the students themselves ask a good question of a U.S. ambassador:
“Their first question to the ambassador was, ‘What’s next for us?’ ” said Robert Lindsey, the State Department’s Egypt coordinator for Access.

The students seemed disappointed by the answer. They were told there were no more steps to Access, that it could help them get into other programs, but that would be up to them.

“We don’t want it to be two years that just passed and then it’s over,” said Sandy Morris, 15, of Minya.

“We took the first step, so we want to take the next step,” said Bishoy Wanees, 15, also of Minya.
That sounds pretty reasonable to me, Bishoy. So allow me to give some free advice to the U.S. government based upon personal experience. As some of you know, I was a classics major in college. When I left the U.S. Army in 2004, that contributed to me being interesting to speak with at a cocktail party but pretty much tits on a bull when it came to international travel. I didn't speak a single living language other than English. I then lived in Lebanon and Egypt while studying Arabic for the next two years. But that wasn't the only language I learned -- I also learned French. I studied French for almost three years in the French cultural centers in Beirut and Cairo -- which offer good, cheap language instruction (subsidized by the French tax-payer) -- in addition to the Alliance Française here in Washington, DC. I also took advantage one summer of a great program -- originally set up for U.S. veterans of the First World War -- at the Sorbonne. The French -- like the British, with the British Council -- take the teaching of their language seriously. And if you go to a French cultural center, the odds are high that you can take classes in French from the novice to advanced levels. But what are you to do then? Well, the French push the application to French universities hard to students who achieve a high degree of proficiency in the language. It strikes me that we Americans should do the same for the Egyptians and Sudanese and Bulgarians and Vietnamese who learn English well enough to rock the TOEFL. Why not? Our university system is considered to be one of the best (if not the best) in the world, and international students who study in the U.S. tend to think highly of our country. (There are, ahem, notable exceptions.) So we should partner this language program with a program that rewards the very best students with a chance to study in the U.S. -- even if it's only for a year-long exchange.

In other and unrelated news, I just had a pint of beer with Charlie at the Hawk and Dove, and Michael Phelps was on the television. Charlie and I are in agreement that all this business over Phelps smoking a little weed is stupid and that all the sponsors should have spent their outrage a few years ago when Phelps got caught driving drunk. Now that is something to be punished for. Smoking weed at a private party, while stupid, is almost harmless. A**holes driving drunk, by contrast, are what kills single mothers on their way home from working the night shift.
Language

34 comments

Add your comment

CNAS retains the right to delete comments that include words that incite violence; are predatory, hateful, or intended to intimidate or harass; or degrade people on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. In summary, don't be a jerk.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <hr><blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Search