Abu Muqawama retains its autonomy and the views and beliefs expressed within the blog do not reflect those of CNAS. Abu Muqawama retains the right to delete comments that include words that incite violence; are predatory, hateful, or intended to intimidate or harass; or degrade people on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. In summary, don't be a jerk.
Reader "Devil Dawg" writes in from Iraq to illustrate the problem I addressed in an earlier post. Not being able to share information with our alleged "partners" due to classification issues is no joke. Neither is the difficulty Gen. McChrystal is going to have getting U.S. military units to truly partner with the ANSF as he intends.
Here's a wonderful anecdote that illustrates the problems with the culture of classified information in the US military and how it affects the mission in Iraq.
Last week, an American unit was traveling -- unescorted, but that's another story -- along a major route in our AO, along which construction workers are installing a new pipeline. During the course of construction, the workers turned up large quantities of munitions, most likely left over from the war with Iran. Hundreds of artillery rounds, mortars, and mines were stacked in large piles on the side of the road. The unit, not having an escort and with only a couple vehicles, did not stop; however, they took some pictures as they passed by and promptly sent out a SPOTREP upon their return to the FOB.That SPOTREP was classified SECRET//NOFORN. So, I've got hundreds of 20+ year old munitions stacked on the side of the road, unguarded, lying in wait for the bad guys -- at this point, it's hard to justify calling anyone an insurgent over here anymore -- to pick them up for a year's worth of IED material or some poor kid to start kicking around the anti-tank mine and lose a leg.Time is, you know, somewhat important here. Alas, I received the original SPOTREP at 1615. The scrubbed version, releasable to the Iraqis, wasn't ready until 2055.Now, you might be asking yourself what's the big deal? Who cares if the IA knows? We'll just send an EOD team out there to pick that stuff up, right?Wrong.We don't have the resources for this stuff anymore. There is exactly one EOD team in the entire province. Furthermore, and this is the important part, Iraq is not our AO anymore. It belongs to the Iraqis; it's their AO. It's their battlespace.Getting the US army in our AO -- I'm on a MiTT and live with the IA; therefore, I am allowed to call it "our" AO -- to understand that has been like telling a four year old he can't have a candy bar.Army Major: Why?Marine Lieutenant: Because of the security agreement.Army Major: Why?Marine Lieutenant: Because of the security agreement.Army Major: Wait, I don't understand.Honestly, I don't think anyone on the brigade staff that RIP'd in last month read the security agreement. I'm not kidding. Their OPORD used all the right key words and phrases, my favorite of which is "by, with, and through the IA", but no one on the brigade staff is putting those words into action. They send out convoys without escorts. They are dragging ass coordinating joint security patrols; they're doing them unilaterally right now. One time, they didn't want to let an IA EOD team into their cordon around a suspected IED. Are you kidding me?When the brigade commander flies down to the Iraqi base where I live and work, the army unit who provides our life support and force protection secures the LZ as if the birds were coming in under fire. They're landing at a division headquarters mind you. Then, his PSD follows him around at the alert, scanning the area for threats as if on patrol.I am literally embarrassed every time they come for a visit.The IA are the main effort. In order to facilitate that effort, we have to share information. As a school trained intelligence officer, I realize the importance of scrubbing information for sources and methods. But, as the above anecdote illustrates, some common sense is in order.Wait, I'm in the US military. Nevermind. Common sense is an uncommon virtue around here.
On the narrow issue of
On the narrow issue of over-classification --- I say again make the regs work for you .
(That's about reverse polarity from my pirate and Elf actual nature BTW. Which shouldn't surprise).
When you classify something, to include with your Skillcraft, you actually fall under almost unknown and seldom enforced regs regarding "classifying authority" and their myriad of responsibilities under the applicable regs ....
(since you're all so lazy...let me get it)
AR 380-5 Classifying Authority
Basically the Army Major or whatever 0-4 Lobotomy patient slap happily pasted "SECRET NOFORN" or whatever became the f*cking owner of that classified SPOTREP and pick until 2055, along with his S-2, possibly Signal Officer, whoever is supposed to be inspecting him, probably the S-3 shop and S-3 actual (it has that particular...fucking idiot...S-3 Sloperations feel about it) but most important (to Officers anyway) his Commander .
Which is partially inclusive of:
1) does he have the proper authority (if not - bupkus)
2) Accounting and records keeping for same
3) Storage and inspection of same
4) Destruction and record of same
5) Passing the Inspecting Authority Inspections
...not all inclusive....now pay particular attention to #1 --- because if he doesn't meet the criteria then Devil Dawg can tell him to go fuck a donkey ....
Now since I know you Generation nexters are probably to lazy to click on the link, here's the opening (and hopefully attention getting) paragraph..
"AR 380-5 2-100. Accountability of classifiers
a. Classifiers are accountable for the propriety of the
classifications they assign, whether by exercise of original
classification authority or by derivative classification.
b. An official who classifies a document or other material and is
identified thereon as the classifier is and continues to be an
accountable classifier even though the document or material is
approved or signed at a higher level in the same organization.
(See subsection 4-104.)"
I hope I did some good today. Feedback and in particular any updates or corrections are welcome.
Classification rules aside,
Classification rules aside, a simple fix is to push qualified Foreign Disclosure Officers (FDOs) down to the lowest level rather than hording them at Division and MEF levels. An FDO at the infantry battalion level would certainly accelerate the process. Of course, there is the common sense rule, sometimes you just have to know when to bend them...
Funniest part about this is
Funniest part about this is that I think the brigade in question is one of the much touted advise and assist brigades.
I just got back from a year
I just got back from a year in Iraq, too. The "army major" on a BCT staff asking the "marine lieutenant" "why?" about not being able to do something because of the Security Agreement is about par for the course right now, regardless of whether it's a new BCT or one that was in country for the past year.
And I thought MY tour
And I thought MY tour sucked...
(since you're all so
(since you're all so lazy...let me get it)
elf rules
Goodness. Really depressing.
Goodness.
Really depressing.
FDOs wouldn't have helped us
FDOs wouldn't have helped us in Afghanistan. By the rules, GIRoA was not a member of GCTF, therefore nothing that was classified above UNCLAS//LIMDIS or FOUO was shareable with ANSF under any circumstances. (Officially; and that's all I'm going to say on that). This included aerial imagery of their own infrastructure, and coordinates of friendly force fixed positions, like our COPs and FOBs.
That was as of April (when I left as OMLT S2 for Kandahar Province). Don't know if the new management has changed that yet.
Interestingly, Pakistan was GCTF, which is a part of the reason why Pakistani ISI personnel (including presumably, some sympathetic to the Taliban) could see a lot of our UAV footage and other intel on the Taliban but no ANSF could.
I once saw a detailed OPORD for an upcoming operation attacked by an ISAF FDO process. The end result that was releasable to the ANA (who were part of the same operation, mind) was basically "you guys may or may not be doing something with us somewhere in Helmand soon. Maybe."
More here.
The above didn't really
The above didn't really matter anyway, btw... there were no translation resources in Afghanistan to translate most of that overclassified stuff into Dari in any case. I'm actually really impressed they had an IA-releasable version in 4 hours. By our Afghan standards that would have been super super fast... 4 *days* would have been more like our likely return spring for clearing and translating the same kind of report. Your Iraq Int O doesn't know how good he's got it.
(In the Afghan context the same report would likely have been quietly slipped by a mentor to his ANA counterpart verbally, and the location cordoned for exploitation, without reference to the regulations prohibiting that communication. Or so I would imagine. Nelson at Copenhagen, etc....)
you could tell them, but
you could tell them, but then you'd have to kill them.
Maybe we should take note of
Maybe we should take note of how it feels to be in a suporting, subordinate role before we go to another hotspot and assume control of the situation from those incompetent locals. . .
. . .every once in a while either military operational debates or policy-level debates have this ridiculous tone of "we can do it, they can't."
If it grinds our gears that much to not be able to tell those infantile Iraqi forces what to do, imagine what it does to a whole proud population that is being told America knows best. . . .
Matt
I thought this kind of crap
I thought this kind of crap was limited to the Army units I served near but it appears as though it is an epidemic. The PSD thing makes me sick, but that is the general attitude I saw in Afghanistan on the part of most of the Army guys -- acting like everyone is hostile, or stupid. It also makes me sick to see the ISAF propaganda videos where such-and-such unit is "partnering" or "shoulder to shoulder" with the ANA. The fact that they think it is so newsworthy should be a warning alarm -- we are not doing this right. Also, where are all the propaganda videos for the ETTs/OMLTs? They have the most deadly job in Afghanistan, yet they are crapped on, not only by the local battlespace owners but by their own chain of command.
For those who missed Gen
For those who missed Gen McCrystal on 60 Minutes last night, he goes into information sharing. Want's more, not less. It's at a bit past the 11:00 mark.
Linky: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1998/07/08/60minutes/main13502.shtml
thanks for the great
thanks for the great discussion... How to Lose Thigh Fat
Groom Speeches
Add your comment