Abu Muqawama: Post

Abu Muqawama retains its autonomy and the views and beliefs expressed within the blog do not reflect those of CNAS. Abu Muqawama retains the right to delete comments that include words that incite violence; are predatory, hateful, or intended to intimidate or harass; or degrade people on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. In summary, don't be a jerk.

Iraq Dispatch: Governance and COIN

Abu Muqawama's Iraq correspondent, Devil Dawg, weighs in on our host nation partners in Iraq:

Much has been made in recent weeks of the need for a reliable and credible host nation government in order for counterinsurgency operations to have a chance of success.  Afghanistan is no doubt the first thought through your head as you read that sentence.  The disconcerting election results and history of less than credible governance by the Karzai administration combined with what I'll politely call the laser-like focus Washington policymakers currently have on the country and their umpteenth policy review are the most likely reasons that Iraq did not immediately come to mind. 
 
I saw something yesterday, however, that makes me question if Iraq is indeed that partner we so desperately need in order to leave this country with at least some modicum of success.
 
We accompanied the division G-9--civil affairs--out on a humanitarian operation to distribute some food downtown.  Contrary to MiTT doctrine, at least USMC MiTT doctrine, we have not accompanied the division on these missions before because we wanted to keep as much of an Iraqi face on the operation as possible; however, this became impossible a couple of weeks ago when a subordinate brigade G-2 was caught loading food sacks into his personal vehicle.  Something about US taxpayer dollars funding an IA brigade G-2's personal food racket didn't sit well with our higher.  Not only can the IA brigades no longer conduct their own humanitarian operations, MiTT personnel now have to accompany the division when it does.
 
So, yesterday we went.
 
Things went really well, at least by Iraqi standards, until we got to the second of two locations.  Now, the reason we moved in the first place was a result of the IA's outer cordon breaking down completely, allowing the masses to start taking food at the cyclic rate.  Several AK-47 rounds into the air did little to dissuade them.  The jundee conducting the operation used the confusion created by moving locations to fill up their Humvees with the very items they were supposed to be handing out.  Our G-9 advisor brought it to the attention of Col Mohammed, who, to his credit, took action.  No words were necessary; the looks on the faces of the men, women, and children as the Humvees were opened and the items intended for them literally spilled out into the street said it all.  The very people who ten minutes earlier were all smiles, grateful to the IA and Marines for their food and cooking stoves, pelted the turret gunners--myself included--with rocks as we pulled away.
 
Way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory guys... and get my ass pelted with rocks.
 
You can draw your own conclusions about the Iraqi government and their credibility as a partner in our counterinsurgency operations here.  After all, this is just one lieutenant's observation and if you believe CSM Philip Johndrow's father, as told in Ralph Peter's interview with the battle hardened CSM in yesterday's New York Post, the lieutenant is the most dangerous person on the battlefield.  I don't think he meant that in a good way.  Luckily, as a Marine lieutenant, that dictum doesn't apply to me.  The bottom line is that if the actions here on the ground are any indication of what occurs in Baghdad, then, and I'm no expert, we could be in trouble here, same as we are in Afghanistan.

COIN, Iraq, Afghanistan

12 comments

As this piece indicates, the

As this piece indicates, the disconnect between what we hope or expect to achieve, in Iraq and in Afghanistan, and the actual realities on the ground -- in these locations -- and in the so-called "intenational community," are staggering.

In truth, these are:

a. No reliable host government(s) to work with and no real hope of having such REQUIRED viable partners anytime in the near or foreseeable future (as this article and the situation in Afghanistan illustrates).

b. No reliable allies to work with and no real hope of having any such REQUIRED viable partners now or in the near or foreseeable future.

c. No significant American or allied "civilian surge force" to follow-on and do the REQUIRED economic development, institution-building, etc., work that will be necessary (Steven Metz article, "Civilian Surge Myth").

d. Insufficient American or allied military forces properly trained, organized, funded, staffed or equipment for such revoluntionarily different and extremely long-term missions.

e. Insufficient American or allied public support for these extremely lengthly and vastly expensive (in lives, treasure and political capital) missions.

In essence, we have got the cart way-way-way out in front of the horse.

We have gradiose ideas -- re: COIN, nation/state-building, societal transformation, etc. -- but this chair, as noted above, has absolutely NONE of the required legs it needs to stand on.

Abu Muqawama, methinks your

Abu Muqawama, methinks your friend is overly negative. Corruption has been around for centuries in the middle east, Central and South Asia. Locals don't expect low corruption. They just expect that corruption won't be astronomical.

One point about the above is slightly troubling. Given that this friend is a Marine MiTT, he is probably embedded with 7th or 1st IAD. Those are the two best divisions in the IA. I would expect nonsense like this from some of the other IA divisions; but not as much from these two crack troop divisions.

"Crack" divisions in the IA

"Crack" divisions in the IA are not quite the same as "crack" Western units.

I agree w/Anan. These governments don't have to be perfect, just better than the enemy --- both in terms of basic competence and morality. And they are, at least for now.

Anan: Point well taken.

Anan: Point well taken. You're right--corruption is endemic in this part of the world and it's not going away. I've studied the region enough and been here long enough to know that. But, if you could have seen the looks on these people. It was heartbreaking.

My pity, however, evaporated rapidly as we got pelted with rocks.

Devil Dawg, yes it is

Devil Dawg, yes it is heartbreaking. The Iraqi people deserve better, and I hope they get it.

devil dawg - well done for

devil dawg - well done for not killing the stone throwers.

gotta be worth some points.....

Iraq dispatch governance and

Iraq dispatch governance and coin.. Nice :)

I agree with your point,

I agree with your point, please share with us more good articles.1974 Buick Century AC Compressor

Add your comment

CNAS retains the right to delete comments that include words that incite violence; are predatory, hateful, or intended to intimidate or harass; or degrade people on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. In summary, don't be a jerk.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <hr><blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Search