Abu Muqawama: Post

Abu Muqawama retains its autonomy and the views and beliefs expressed within the blog do not reflect those of CNAS. Abu Muqawama retains the right to delete comments that include words that incite violence; are predatory, hateful, or intended to intimidate or harass; or degrade people on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. In summary, don't be a jerk.

Gian Gentile's Reading List

I am off to Indiana today to give a talk on the conflict in Afghanistan, but last night, I met counterinsurgency non-enthusiast Gian Gentile for a few rounds of beer at Kramerbooks, and before we parted, we exchanged book recommendations. Here are the two that he recommended:

1. Jim Wilbanks, Abandoning Vietnam: How America Left and South Vietnam Lost Its War

2. Jon Sumida, Decoding Clausewitz: A New Approach to On War

My recommendations included S.C. Gwynne's Empire of the Summer Moon: Quanah Parker and the Rise and Fall of the Comanches, the Most Powerful Indian Tribe in American History and Mike Horowitz's new book.

Oh, and the Belhaven Scottish Stout? Yes.

Books

53 comments

*belhaven belhaven scottish

*belhaven

belhaven scottish ale is sublime.

Think we lost the Vietnam

Think we lost the Vietnam war....

You have not seen anything yet.

http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/world/2010/09/14/vause.mandarin.cnn

It can change, BUY AMERICAN. This one is an economic war and we are the enemy. Got Off - shoring?

All depends on what language you want your children to speak.

The Empire of the Summer

The Empire of the Summer Moon is a fine book. I also recommend TR Fehrenbach's Comanches: The History of a People for a more indepth look at the rise and fall of North America's Mongols.

RH

AM, Gwynne is good, but for

AM,

Gwynne is good, but for more academic works gotta get Pekka Haimalainen's Comanche Empire, which lays out Comanches as political actors using violence for their own ends, and Brian DeLay's War of a Thousand Deserts which shows how violence in the borderland between the US and Mexico led to the US-Mexican War. Pekka is at UC Santa B and Brian is at UC Berk. Both are good, young scholars, friends of mine, and amenable to discussion. Oh, and if you go down this Indian Wars road, Anna Simons at NPS has done some thinking along those lines.

Wish I could recommend my work on the role of violence in relations between Apaches and Hispanics, but it is at least a year away!

LR Blyth, Ph.D.
LAII, UNM
lrblyth@unm.edu

http://cnas.org/blogs/abumuqa

http://cnas.org/blogs/abumuqawama/2009/04/what-neoconservatives-got-righ...

So did Anon Bold win the debate here? After 9 yrs, it took America awhile to get anti-Muslim, but when they did, they pissed all over their 1st Amendment right and then some.

The question is why did SNLII and his views (smart, historical, intellectual) get overtaken?

Maybe Exum can give us a Muslim reading/viewing list? And ideas on how to counter the anti-Muslim wave.

Read Ishad Manji's book and

Read Ishad Manji's book and her new book coming out.

Also google her appearances, debates, talks, they are every where on video.

Peace in the Middle East.

@SNLII vs. Anon Bold For me

@SNLII vs. Anon Bold

For me it is NOT "anti-Muslim".

It is "anti-Radical Muslim" and it always has been

Everyone I talk to agrees. One person says Al Qaeda, the other says Radical.....same thing.

Way I look at it the people in the towers were ground to atoms and spread all over. We saw the dust clouds, they went way further than two blocks they went into American hearts and minds. Word to the wise, if America ever gets polarized on the subject I would hate to get against that.

As for First Admendment Rights. You cannot yell fire in a crowded theater. Meeting and worship places have been stopped by city zone laws. There is nothing in the Constitution that says you can say "anything" you want or have a meeting place "anywhere" you like.

BACK to READING LISTS......

"Everyone" meaning Ivory

"Everyone" meaning Ivory Tower intellectuals, those with "COEXIST" bumper stickers and "moderate" Muslims? LOL. That's not "Everyone".

Radical, if we follow the

Radical, if we follow the Dalia Mogahed poll, is 91 million (maybe more) Muslims. That's a lot.

When people say "extremists"

When people say "extremists" or "radicals", I'm thinking maybe hundreds or a few thousands (if it's a movement), but 100 million is CRAZY!

What is causing 100 million Muslims to say, terrorism is OK, stoning in this day of age is OK, banning music is OK, ensuring women wear burqas or niqabs is OK, killing apostates is OK, killing Christian missionaries is OK, cutting of the clitoris is OK, banning women from praying in Mosques, etc etc?

What is it?

How about Muslim punks? Do

How about Muslim punks? Do they represent Islam? link: http://www.taqwacore.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNdvsLh128Q (Gerd Puin)
"the early history of the Koranic text is much more of an open question than many have suspected: the text was less stable, and therefore had less authority, than has always been claimed."
http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/99jan/koran.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lk40dR8UpaU (Christoph Luxenberg)
"Not in the history of commentary on the Qur’ān has a work like this been produced."
http://syrcom.cua.edu/Hugoye/Vol6No1/HV6N1PRPhenixHorn.html

The problem I have with the

The problem I have with the Comanche super-warrior narrative is that the US Army of the day didn't necessarily see it that way. I direct your attention the 1893 sixth edition of a text used for officer promotion boards and West Point instruction, The Service of Security and Information, by CPT (later COL) Arthur Lockwood Wagner, who held up the Apache (mounted infantry) and Sioux (cavalry) as the ultimate exemplars of Indian warfare:

http://books.google.com/books?id=wKBDAAAAIAAJ&dq=the%20service%20of%20in...

+1 on Pekka Haimalainen's Comanche Empire being the more authoritative work.

What happened Justin L.,

What happened Justin L., don't you like Bacha Bazi too? If we leave that magical place as you suggest, you won't get to enjoy this forbidden Afghan delight, pretend you're a Catholic priest with Justin Bieber dancing only for you..

"What is causing 100 million

"What is causing 100 million Muslims to say, terrorism is OK, stoning in this day of age is OK, banning music is OK, ensuring women wear burqas or niqabs is OK, killing apostates is OK, killing Christian missionaries is OK, cutting of the clitoris is OK, banning women from praying in Mosques, etc etc?"

It's called "Islam".

"After 9 yrs, it took America awhile to get anti-Muslim, but when they did, they pissed all over their 1st Amendment right and then some."

America is anti-Muslim now? When did that happen? You mean the same anti-Muslim America in which the four most powerful people in the national security bureaucracy jumped with both feet on one insignificant American who planned to "insult Islam"? Yeah, we really pissed all over our First Amendment rights in our anti-Muslim rage by allowing a mosque at Ground Zero but preventing one idiot from burning a Koran. Listen to yourself, you're just babbling.

Visitor at 7:16 A.M.: "You

Visitor at 7:16 A.M.:

"You mean the same anti-Muslim America in which the four most powerful people in the national security bureaucracy jumped with both feet on one insignificant American who planned to "insult Islam"? Yeah, we really pissed all over our First Amendment rights in our anti-Muslim rage by allowing a mosque at Ground Zero but preventing one idiot from burning a Koran. Listen to yourself, you're just babbling."

It would be good if more people understood exactly what their First Amendment rights were. The First Amendment prohibits the GOVERNMENT except in certain narrow exceptions from regulating/prohibiting the exercise of free speech by its citizens. The preacher was not threatened with criminal prosecution or a civil injunction or a civil suit for damages. The "four most powerful people in the national security bureaucracy" did not "jump with both feet" but crawled on their hands and knees, licked his shoes, and begged the preacher to not follow through. There was absolutely NOTHING they or anyone else could have done LEGALLY to stop the preacher, except to beg. He didn't follow through because apparently it PLEASED him not to.

Please tell me they made you

Please tell me they made you say ooey pooey.

Only the greatest college acronym in history.

"The First Amendment

"The First Amendment prohibits the GOVERNMENT except in certain narrow exceptions from regulating/prohibiting the exercise of free speech by its citizens. The preacher was not threatened with criminal prosecution or a civil injunction or a civil suit for damages."

Oh, puhleaze! The President, the SecState, the SecDef, and the CJCS don't have to threaten the guy with criminal prosecution or a civil injunction or a civil suit for damages in order to inhibit the exercise of free speech by American citizens. That's asinine. The mere fact that they publicly called on him not to do what he said he was going to do was a de facto effort to regulate his free speech.

Wiki defines chilling effect as "a term in law and communication which describes a situation where speech or conduct is suppressed by fear of penalization at the interests of an individual or group. It may prompt self-censorship and therefore hamper free speech." That is EXACTLY what happened here. The big dogs barked, and the result was self-censorship.

Madhu: I think you're

Madhu:

I think you're opening a gigantic can of worms here. I would suffice it to say that, in my opinion, qualitative ("small-n") social scientists - or, at least, political scientists - feel (and I use the word "feel" deliberately) tremendous pressure to justify their methodology, probably more so than their purely (because "mixed methods," which also sounds like "mixed martial arts" to me, is arguably the trend of the day) quantitative colleagues.. They fear being attacked of engaging in mere interpretivism (inductivist) as opposed to positivist (deductivist) hypothesis testing. Hence they attack quantitative social scientists where it can be attacked - e.g., quantitative social science produces spurious correlation - and defend their own work where it can be defended - e.g., the rationales for the cases they use (case selection) and methods they use (e.g., process tracing), as well as Theda Skocpol's famous (or not famous) declaration ("States and Social Revolutions") that small-n work is best when there are too many variables and non-enough cases; if you really want to get a good, and not necessarily unsympathetic critique of her perspective, read "Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology," in "The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences."

Hopefully I've confused you more than you were before.

Best
ADTS

Was looking at the reading

Was looking at the reading list. Noted that the local library has some of the books on shelf.

Interesting about the Empire of the Summer Moon. Book was based on accounts of what people saw makes you wonder if the information was dressed up a bit. That started me thinking about how the good ole USA got most of its land west of the orginal 13 states.

We purchased it.

Darn Indians should have put a stake in the ground and got a deed. Maybe that is what all those arrows were about? Folks that got the point are not around any more. Commanches made good fighters, bad lawyers. I think the Taliban have a few laywers on the payroll.

New Stategy in Afghanistan? Ask Karsai how much he would take for the place, I am sure that Benny could print up some money for the transaction. Then have a free land program. Isn't there "gold in them there hills"?

Purchase Afghanistan.

Trillion gone already, could have applied that to the purchase price. Think the price would have been better if we had not told them about the trillion in natural resources.

Visitor at 9:32 A.M. Would

Visitor at 9:32 A.M.

Would you be so kind as to cite a court decision with a link to the opinion that holds that a government official's ASKING/BEGGING of a citizen to not exercise his free speech rights is unconsitutional. "Chilling effect" is a legal word of art, which has been litigated in many cases. You shouldn't have any trouble finding an opinion that supports your argument, if one exists. Wikipedia is useful but is no authority for your argument.

Be that as it may, maybe the preacher did self-censor because of a fear of some government retribution. Maybe he had some scandal in his past. Who knows?

If you haven't noticed, the preacher very successfully exercised his free speech rights. He got his message spread all over the world.

ADTS....@9.54 Get past it

ADTS....@9.54

Get past it and just say......Academics is just another pissing contest.

More letters at the end, the bigger the ego.

Think these guys are PhD's!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNafue2H9v0

Ops, I think someone dropped

Ops, I think someone dropped out of their freshman year. LOL.

"If you haven't noticed, the

"If you haven't noticed, the preacher very successfully exercised his free speech rights. He got his message spread all over the world."

Yup, and caused headaches in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Kashmir. He certainly did get his message spread. At the eve of Afghan elections, our troops have to deal with his BS?

We should've taken Pastor Jones to Gitmo when this all began, and made him a Bacha Bazi to the many Afghan detainees there. They would've had a field day in his ass, literally. That's how these guys role--right Josh, you're the Afghan expert here. "Hot tranny mess" would be an understatement.

@@==== -) ..... (*jiz*)

@Visitor 10:19 So, based on

@Visitor 10:19

So, based on your arguments you would have no problem if Pres. Obama etc. were to go "ASKING/BEGGING" the NY Imam to move his Mosque away from ground zero, and he relented? You'd have no problem with that right?

Simeone at 1:24 P.M. "So,

Simeone at 1:24 P.M.
"So, based on your arguments you would have no problem if Pres. Obama etc. were to go "ASKING/BEGGING" the NY Imam to move his Mosque away from ground zero, and he relented? You'd have no problem with that right?"

Absolutely no problem at all.

Speech can persuade. Some speech persuades more effectively than other speech. Maybe the preacher called off the bonfire after having soberly considered the arguments against it and deciding that was correct thing to do. Maybe if Obama had tried to persuade the Iman to build somewhere else, he would have.

You will note that in neither of my comments above at 8:53 A.M. and at 10:19 A.M. did I express my opinion, pro or con, about the location of the mosque or the substance of the preacher's speech. What was driving my comments is an incomplete understanding by many people of first amendment free speech rights. Moreover you will note that both of my comments were focused exclusively on the preacher's free speech rights. I wrote nothing about the mosque.

I unfairly in my comment at 10:19 A.M. challenged Visitor at 9:32 A.M. to cite a court case that supported his argument. Afterwards I did a google advanced search limited to PDFs with search terms of "chilling effect law" and received over 67,000 hits. Also I did a fastcase all jurisdiction search with the search terms of "chilling effect" and received 100,000 links to published opinions.

There is a lot more to first amendment free speech law than what is taught in a high school government class.

@ X....good example. Proves

@ X....good example. Proves the theory.....

http://www.nuvo.net/indianapo

http://www.nuvo.net/indianapolis/warrior-scholar-blogger-andrew-exum-on-...

http://www.indianaworld.org/distinguished_speakers

With fees like that, you should easily pay off those college loans.... in a few decades!

CNAS is probably giving you the double goocher on this trip- 94 / 41 per-diem ...looks like you'll be eating at "Steak 'N Shake" for all 3 meals?

Hope this gig leads to bigger and better things for you Ex.

Cheers!

"As an army and

"As an army and special-forces commander in Iraq and Afghanistan..."

Rangers are SF now?

What's the comanche analogue

What's the comanche analogue of the movie "Zulu"? I bet it has John Wayne in it.

To go with Horowitz' book you can also read James Q. Wilson's "Bureaucracy". Haven't read "The Innovator's Dilemma", but heard good things about it.

Alamo Scout, wikipedia says

Alamo Scout, wikipedia says that they are indeed special operations.

But NOT SF--Special Forces,

But NOT SF--Special Forces, Green Berets.

But NOT SF--Special Forces,

But NOT SF--Special Forces, Green Berets.

Some other things of

Some other things of interest from AlJazeera

Part 1 & 2 are about Strategy discussion dated to 2009 leading up to the surge in Afghanistan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PupXTUn9Mo Empire - Obama and Afghanistan pt1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dr4to5T04w&NR=1 Part 2

This is the Islamic view of the War on Terror.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vny5wZrPAjw&feature=channel

Think the last program gives a view as to why the State Department is working so hard on current peace talks. I see the peace talks as a Hail Mary play by the current administration. Hope it works, but considering the history of all the players it is a high risk long shot. If you accept the three pilars discussed in the video(oil, status quo, and israel) I think that we would have more control and influence by getting out of the oil business. We would have to relax some of our EPA laws to do it, but it would open a door to independence with a goal of finding a cleaner solution. Relaxing EPA regs don't even seem to be on the table these days, but it would be a fast track solution (compared to a new energy technology). There has been some discussion of linkage between energy policy and the Afghan war it is not main stream and could be.

Our troops complain that Joe Plumber is not involved in the fight then bring the fight home by not using oil products that is a fight that every US consumer can be part of . If Dubai does not like a barrel of oil priced in dollars then link oil to something that they can relate to, a bag of food.

There are a lot of ways to change the status quo (Arms sales, Food, Military Protection).

Another way to change the status quo. BUY THE AMERICAN LABEL. (Save oil while helping dig out of the economic hole we are in, consumption is one of the biggest trump cards Americans can play in the world economy and we have total control of it !!! )

Guess were I am going is the strategy for the War on Terror (or however you want to spin it) needs to be comprehensive without putting the world on US welfare and considers the cost of the program (plus energy, plus middle east peace talks, plus how we deal with oil partners, plus how we deal with community centers in NY, plus how we act on the world stage, plus where we manufacture, plus social security, plus ....you get the picture, comprehensive that is what the Afghan stategy should be).

We got all these Harvard grads, highly educated, suppose to be the best in the business, walk accross water going into work every morning, hot shots that can not seem to get it right. Why is the American public letting these guys get away with marginal performance at a six figure salary with benefits that you can not dream of in the private sector anymore? Fifty odd million Americans do not have health insurance, but they are all contributing to the health insurance of these Federal Employees that are not performing............why?

hater.

hater.

Vistor @ 12:11pm Hateful?

Vistor @ 12:11pm

Hateful?

What is hateful about stopping a war while getting the American economy back on track and getting out of a bad situation.

Vistor @ 12:11pm Hateful?

Vistor @ 12:11pm

Hateful?

What is hateful about stopping a war while getting the American economy back on track and getting out of a bad situation.

hater, as in playa hater.

hater, as in playa hater.

@So did Anon Bold win the

@So did Anon Bold win the debate here? After 9 yrs, it took America awhile to get anti-Muslim, but when they did, they pissed all over their 1st Amendment right and then some.

Yes. It happened after 19 mos of being attacked at home again, shot to fuck at Ft Hood, a President who goes around apologizing for the nation he is the putative leader of, culminating in the obscenity of a Mega Mosque overlooking the Ground Zero graveyard, and finally the Shankville PA submission to Islam on 9/11/10 by POTUS. Which he has no right to do, but he doesn't know his limits.

The question is why did SNLII and his views (smart, historical, intellectual) get overtaken?

By events, see above. Also the fact that Anon Bold has a plan, and a achievable wartime goal. DC, and the academics don't. You might recall my own ideas on adopting the Takfiri defense mechanism. That's pretty much fucked now. The Board has been completely thrown up into the air, most of the pieces will come down where they may. There's only Queens - white and black - fixed. In downtown Manhattan.

Maybe Exum can give us a Muslim reading/viewing list? to acknowledge that Islam has anything to do with the war is to destroy his carefully confabulated Liberal Lego world. So, er..real unlikely. May I suggest "Milestones" and "The Management of Savagery". There's also "Global Guerrillas".

And ideas on how to counter the anti-Muslim wave. . Yeah. You need guns and bullets for about 200 million pissed off and pissed on Americans.

Reap the benefits of being a Liberal Client, oh Amiriki Muslimiyah. You.Are.So.Fucked.

The idea that America is

The idea that America is anti-Muslim now is completely fatuous.

You Delta boys are a bunch

You Delta boys are a bunch of undisciplined cowboys. Let me tell you something, Alamo Scout. When we get on the five yard line, you're gonna need my Rangers. So y'all better learn to be team players. We're done here!

SNLII, what law has

SNLII, what law has infringed on first amendment rights?

I bet he enjoyed the

I bet he enjoyed the workout, as much as the biscuits 'n gravy @ the Loveless Cafe this weekend Exum!

As a web-site owner I think

As a web-site owner I think the material here is reallymagnificent. I appreciate it for your time. You ought to keep it up forever! Excellent Luck.

Add your comment

CNAS retains the right to delete comments that include words that incite violence; are predatory, hateful, or intended to intimidate or harass; or degrade people on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. In summary, don't be a jerk.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <hr><blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Search