Natural Security Blog: Post

The Economy, Energy and Climate Change: The State of the Union

Last night President Obama delivered his first State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress. (A full transcript and video of the speech are available, courtesy of the White House.) While watching last night, I was curious how the president would mention energy and climate change, given that the major theme of last night’s speech, as one would suspect, was the economy.  

It was interesting, though not at all unexpected, that the president discussed energy and climate change in the context of creating new jobs and building a clean energy economy. With jobs to top the president’s agenda in 2010, he emphasized that “We should put more Americans to work building clean energy facilities and give rebates to Americans who make their homes more energy-efficient, which supports clean energy jobs.”

“We need to encourage American innovation,” the president said, “And no area is more ripe for such innovation than energy.” President Obama even made the case by highlighting last year’s investments in clean energy: “the North Carolina company that will create 1,200 jobs nationwide helping to make advanced batteries; or in the California business that will put a thousand people to work making solar panels.”  Additional investments to help shore up our independence from foreign oil included “opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development…continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies.” President Obama even declared that building a clean energy economy meant “passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America.” This kind of federal investment in energy innovation is important to increasing energy security to be sure, but implementation is going to be key here (see our 2009 workshop report on just that). And much of that implementation will be up to market conditions and individuals that may not be acting in concert with the president’s bold plans.

His support for “building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country” aroused notable applause from his political opposition on the floor. (You’ll recall in a post from July 2009 that Republican Senator Bob Corker, speaking before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, explicitly emphasized the need to build many, many nuclear plants to combat climate change.) If I could have added a bit more natural security-style spin to the speech, I would not have completely separated discussion of nuclear energy innovation from his later emphasis on nonproliferation and disarmament – though, understandably, that might have been a bit too Atoms-for-Peace-y. The nuclear piece could have provided a nice segue between the economy and security sections, as we find them to be closely interrelated.

What I thought was particularly interesting was that the president highlighted the controversy with the evidence behind global climate change, no doubt in reference to the recent news that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published inaccurate data and findings on the link between climate change and melting glaciers in its 2007 report.

“I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change,” the president said (emphasis mine):

But here's the thing – even if you doubt the evidence, providing incentives for energy-efficiency and clean energy are the right thing to do for our future – because the nation that leads the clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the global economy.  And America must be that nation.

The only other mention of climate change came during his discussion of the current wars and the future security environment. The president addressed the threats from al Qaeda, prosecuting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, “the greatest danger to the American people – the threat of nuclear weapons,” and the threats associated with Iran and North Korea. But toward the end of this section, President Obama said “We have gone from a bystander to a leader in the fight against climate change.” Mentioning climate change in this section, albeit briefly, reiterated his long-held position that climate change is also a national security issue.  

President Obama lauded the House for passing a clean energy and climate bill last year, “And this year I'm eager to help advance the bipartisan effort in the Senate,” he said. With this and his commitments to innovation, it will be interesting to see how the administration moves on these issues over the next 12 months.

Photo: President Obama delivers his first State of the Union address. Courtesy of Pete Souza and the White House.

Climate Change, Energy

1 comment

Good post! But I actually

Good post! But I actually thought one of the few awkward or false notes in the speech was the mention of the "overwhelming scientific evidence" behind climate change. The IPCC imbroglio is no small thing -- that was a MAJOR error that suggests serious analytical flaws in what has been the go-to climate science resource. It may be a one-off flaw, but the IPCC is going to need to demonstrate that. The sooner Dr. Pachauri says that he has convened a highly qualified panel to conduct a top-to-bottom review of the 4th Assessment for accuracy, the better. Until that is done, the entire document is now suspect, unfortunately, with serious blow back for all climate change science.

I think it was not a good idea for the President to elide that particular controversy, and his voice even faltered and he more or less acknowledged the hecklers, whether he meant to or not. It would have been better for him to acknowledge that there are valid concerns about the 4th Assessment, but that fortunately we have a significant body of data and evidence other than the IPCC to rely on, including US national data and analysis.

Add your comment

CNAS retains the right to delete comments that include words that incite violence; are predatory, hateful, or intended to intimidate or harass; or degrade people on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. In summary, don't be a jerk.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <hr><blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.