Minerals


Minerals

Reliable access to critical minerals is a matter of both economic and geostrategic importance to the United States. While concern about access to minerals waxes and wanes, it is rising now due to increasing demand, new competitors capturing large market shares and other trends that defy easy prediction. These same trends can interfere with important foreign and defense policy goals and give mineral suppliers easy leverage over the United States and other countries reliant on global supply chains. Despite renewed attention to critical minerals, America’s dependence on these minerals is often misunderstood and miscast in the public debate. Today’s global economy depends on the availability of a wide range of non-fuel minerals that are essential for the manufacture of everything from aircraft to computer screens. Given the importance of these resources, including for defense systems, the U.S. government must be proactive in reducing a range of vulnerabilities of the global supply chain that today are not well understood.

Read the Report: Elements of Security: Mitigating the Risks of U.S. Dependence on Critical Minerals

This report, Elements of Security: Mitigating the Risks of U.S. Dependence on Critical Minerals, explores a range of potential vulnerabilities that stem from dependence on several minerals that the United States will need for defense supply chains and clean energy goals in the decades ahead. The report examines cases of five individual minerals – lithium, gallium, rhenium, tantalum and niobium – and rare earth elements, such as neodymium, samarium and dysprosium, as a sixth group in order to show the complexity of addressing these concerns. As the report recommends, the U.S. government can take several cost-effective, proactive measures to prevent mineral issues from impinging on security, foreign policy and economic growth plans in the years ahead.

Click here to read more about our work on critical minerals.