-

Hard Choices: Responsible Defense in an Age of Austerity
Type of Publication: ReportDate: 10/03/2011Hard Choices: Responsible Defense in an Age of Austerity, a report authored by CNAS experts LTG David W. Barno, USA (Ret.), Dr. Nora Bensahel and Travis Sharp, outlines four budget cut scenarios and evaluates possible trade-offs among force structure, end strength, procurement and overhead.
| more | -

Fueling the Future Force: Preparing the Department of Defense for a Post-Petroleum Era
Author(s): Christine Parthemore, Dr. John A. NaglType of Publication: ReportDate: 09/27/2010This report argues that the Department of Defense (DOD) must prepare to transition smoothly to a future in which it does not depend on petroleum – no small task given that 77 percent of DOD’s energy needs depend on petroleum for fuel. Authors Christine Parthemore and John Nagl offer 12 specific guiding principles that map a path forward for the Department, helping to ensure that DOD can weather change, protect its own interests, reduce its vulnerability to extreme price spikes and – most importantly – ensure that it can meet its mandate to protect the nation’s security.
| more | -

Recommendations for Congress – Contracting in Conflicts: The Path to Reform
Author(s): Dr. John A. Nagl, Richard FontaineType of Publication: FactsheetDate: 07/15/2010Recent congressional hearings on government contractors in conflict zones illustrate the acute awareness on Capitol Hill and across all branches of government of the urgent need for contracting reform. This factsheet details specific policy recommendations for Congress as laid out in the CNAS report Contracting in Conflicts: The Path to Reform.
| more | -

Contracting in Combat Zones: Who Are Our Subcontractors?
Author(s): Richard FontaineType of Publication: Congressional TestimonyDate: 06/29/2010CNAS Senior Fellow Richard Fontaine testified on the problems associated with contracting in conflicts and areas for reform before the U.S. Congressional Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
| more | -

Are Private Security Contractors Performing Inherently Governmental Functions?
Author(s): Dr. John A. NaglType of Publication: Congressional TestimonyDate: 06/18/2010CNAS President Dr. John Nagl testified before the federal Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan on the proper role and oversight of security contractors supporting U.S. operations in Southwest Asia.
| more | -

Contracting In Conflicts: The Path to Reform
Author(s): Richard Fontaine, Dr. John A. NaglType of Publication: ReportDate: 06/07/2010In both Iraq and Afghanistan, there are currently more private contractors than U.S. troops on the ground. This report calls for the U.S. government to embark on a path of ambitious reform that will increase federal oversight and better protect U.S. taxpayer dollars from potential waste, fraud and abuse.
| more | -

The Burden: America's Hard Choices in Post-Election Iraq
Author(s): Thomas E. RicksType of Publication: Policy BriefDate: 02/24/2010In this policy brief, CNAS Senior Fellow Tom Ricks argues that U.S. and Iraqi policymakers should go back to the drawing board and find a solution that prevents Iraq from unraveling, and recommends the Obama Administration signal to Iraqi leaders that the United States is open to re-negotiating the Status of Forces Agreement.
| more | -

Contractors in American Conflicts: Adapting to a New Reality
Author(s): Richard Fontaine, Dr. John A. NaglType of Publication: Working PapersDate: 12/16/2009When our nation goes to war, contractors go with it. This working paper explores the problems posed by the increased reliance of contractors in Afghanistan and Iraq, including insufficient oversight, inadequate integration into operational planning, and ambiguous legal status.
| more | -

Unfinished Business: U.S. Overseas Military Presence in the 21st Century
Author(s): Dr. Michael O’HanlonType of Publication: ReportDate: 06/11/2008The next American president will inherit an overseas military base realignment process begun in the first term of the George W. Bush administration. This realignment, guided by an effort known as the Global Posture Review (GPR), was perhaps former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld s chief intellectual and policy accomplishment during his six-year tenure at the Pentagon. Unlike his likely warfighting legacy, particularly in regard to Iraq, the GPR is on generally sound conceptual foundations. But a successful outcome for the Global Posture Review, roughly halfway implemented as of early 2008, will depend on the next U.S. administration refining numerous rough edges of the current plan and redefining the broader national security policy context in which any base realignment will inevitably be viewed.
| more |














