Home › Events › The Iranian Nuclear Dilemma: Risk of an Iraq Sequel?
 

The Iranian Nuclear Dilemma: Risk of an Iraq Sequel?

colin kahl, center for a new american security, cnas, iran, wmd, israel
Date:

February 21, 2012
10:45am - 12:00pm

Location:

Rayburn House Office Building
Room B339
Washington, DC

On February 21, CNAS Senior Fellow Colin Kahl participated in a panel discussion hosted by the National Iranian American Council on the status of the Iranian nuclear program. Dr. Kahl indicated that there are a number of differences between the current situation in Iran and the lead-up to the war in Iraq. He also explained the mentality behind a possible Israeli airstrike on Iranian facilities and what consequences it might have for the future. Other panel speakers included Hans Blix, former Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Robert Kelley, former Chief Inspector for the IAEA in Iraq.

Click here to watch video coverage of the event.

Click here to read the transcript.

Related Content

  • Upheaval: U.S. Policy Toward Iran in a Changing Middle East
    Upheaval: U.S. Policy Toward Iran in a Changing Middle East
    Author(s): Dr. Marc Lynch
    Type of Publication: Report
    Date: 05/19/2011

    The wave of uprisings that have rocked the Arab world will have dramatic consequences for America's strategy toward Iran. The foundations of the Obama administration’s Iran strategy are crumbling. This report lays out a U.S. strategy toward Iran that is a policy reset from the regional status quo.

    | more |
  • The Case for Game-Changing Diplomacy with Iran
    Type of Publication: Policy Brief
    Date: 09/13/2008

    The next American president must come to office with an Iran plan ready to implement on Day One of his administration. That plan should center on conducting game-changing diplomacy with Iran.

    | more |
  • Iran Report
    Iran: Assessing U.S. Strategic Options
    Type of Publication: Report
    Date: 09/12/2008

    Dealing with Iran and its nuclear program will be an urgent priority for the next president. In order to evaluate U.S. policy options, the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) convened a bipartisan group of experts on foreign policy and national security, retired military personnel, former diplomats and other government officials, and specialists on Iran and the region. Ambassador Dennis Ross presented a paper on diplomatic strategies for dealing with Iran, and Dr. Suzanne Maloney wrote on potential Iranian responses. Dr. Ashton Carter evaluated various U.S. military options, and Dr. Vali Nasr described likely Iranian reactions and other potential impacts. Ambassador Richard Haass considered the challenges of living with a nuclear Iran. Each of these papers represents an important contribution to a much-needed national discussion on U.S. policy toward Iran. Based on these papers and expert group discussion, as well as additional research and analysis, three CNAS authors (Dr. James Miller, Christine Parthemore, and Dr. Kurt Campbell) proposed that the next administration pursue “game-changing diplomacy” with Iran. While both Iran and the international community would be better off if Iran plays ball, game-changing diplomacy is designed to improve prospects for the United States and the international community irrespective of how Iran responds.

    | more |
  • Iraq Report
    Shaping the Iraq Inheritance
    Type of Publication: Report
    Date: 06/11/2008

    American policy in Iraq will undergo two critical transitions throughout the remainder of 2008 and into early 2009: movement to a new U.S. posture in Iraq; and a wartime transition to a new administration. It is vital that both are handled in a way that best advances U.S. interests in Iraq and the region. Yet neither is being paid sufficient attention. Shaping the Iraq Inheritance outlines America’s interests in Iraq and the region, analyzes recent security and political trends, presents a framework for understanding U.S. strategic options, and makes recommendations for how the Bush administration, the military, and Congress can best prepare for the dangerous period ahead.

    | more |
  • The Case for Conditional Engagement in Iraq
    Type of Publication: Policy Brief
    Date: 03/06/2008

    Five years into the war in Iraq with no end in sight, a new strategy is needed. The current strategy of unconditional support to Iraq’s central government has not produced nearly enough political progress. President Bush and those wishing to succeed him should embrace a new political strategy in Iraq that makes our military presence conditional on political accommodation...

    | more |
  • Measuring Progress in Iraq
    Type of Publication: Policy Brief
    Date: 08/30/2007

    Nobody seems to know how to talk about and evaluate “progress” in Iraq, or the lack thereof. In the context of the confusion, progress should be evaluated along several dimensions: type, location, causal direction, and possibilities for aggregation and sustainability.

    | more |

There are no multimedia items to display.

  • Dr. Colin H. Kahl
    Dr. Colin H. Kahl
    Senior Fellow

    Dr. Colin H. Kahl is a Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) focusing on Middle East security and defense policy and an associate professor in the Security Studies Program at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service.

    | Read Full Bio |
  • Iraq

    The Center for a New American Security is committed to shaping and elevating the debate on the most difficult strategic issues facing America, including the aftermath of the war in Iraq.

    | more |
  • WMD & Nuclear Proliferation
    WMD and Nuclear Proliferation

    Weapons of mass destruction (WMD), including the dangers of nuclear and biological weapons proliferation, pose perhaps the gravest national security threat to the United States. CNAS continues to examine the threat of WMD posed by state actors – including Iran and North Korea – as well as non-state actors. CNAS also examines U.S. nonproliferation and arms control efforts, as well as other preventative and response plans for potential WMD attacks. 

    | more |
  • Iran: U.S. Strategic Options
    Iran

    U.S. policy is committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, and the administration’s “dual track” policy of pressure and diplomacy aims to achieve that objective. Yet despite unprecedented international sanctions, Iran’s nuclear progress and support for terrorism and regional militancy continue. The CNAS Iran project, led by Senior Fellow Dr. Colin Kahl, former U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East, provides detailed assessments of the global and regional consequences of Iranian nuclearization and the full range of policy alternatives for addressing the threat. 

    | more |
  • Iraq Inheritance
    Iraq

    After nearly a decade at war, American troops have departed Iraq. But Iraq still matters to vital U.S. national interests. The security environment is much improved, but Iraq continues to be beset by terrorist violence, sectarian tension and political infighting. CNAS research focuses on policy options for promoting enduring stability in Iraq and a long-term U.S.-Iraq strategic partnership.

     

     

    | more |
  • Middle East

    Despite the drawdown of U.S. forces from Iraq and Afghanistan, and desires to “rebalance” to Asia, the Middle East continues to dominate the U.S. national security agenda. CNAS conducts cutting-edge research on the most pressing issues in this turbulent region, including responses to the challenges posed by Iranian nuclearization, the Arab Spring, Syria and Iraq.

     

     

     

    | more |
  • U.S. Military Forces and Operations

    CNAS examines the force structure, roles, missions, and overall health and wellness of America's military in order to help ensure our forces are prepared for the demands of 21st century conflict.

    | more |
  • U.S. National Security and Defense Policy

    U.S. National Security and Defense Policy

    | more |
  • WMD and Nuclear Proliferation

    Weapons of mass destruction (WMD), including the dangers of nuclear and biological weapons proliferation, pose perhaps the gravest national security threat to the United States. CNAS continues to examine the threat of WMD posed by state actors – including Iran and North Korea – as well as non-state actors. CNAS also examines U.S. nonproliferation and arms control efforts, as well as other preventative and response plans for potential WMD attacks.

    | more |