October 24, 2024
How Donald Trump Could Undermine the U.S. Dollar
No matter who wins the upcoming U.S. presidential election, one thing is all but certain: The United States will continue relying on sanctions as its go-to foreign policy tool. Each 21st-century American president has imposed more sanctions than the last. Donald Trump issued nearly twice as many sanctions per year as Barack Obama, and Joe Biden has already doubled Trump’s tally.
This points to a structural reality: In a world of rising tensions among nuclear-armed states, economic war is far more palatable than actual war. Yet America’s addiction to sanctions flies in the face of high-level warnings that the habit could have dire consequences. Former Treasury Secretary Jack Lew famously cautioned that “overuse of sanctions” could undermine U.S. economic leadership and herald the demise of the almighty dollar.
The point here isn’t that sanctions can’t hurt the dollar — they can. But the real danger is misuse rather than overuse.
But the past few years have taught us a key lesson: The risk isn’t in using sanctions too much, it’s in wielding them rashly and alone. And this lesson reveals that the next U.S. president’s sanctions policy could have serious ramifications for the dollar’s global role — especially if the next president is Donald Trump.
To understand this, we need to revisit 2018, Trump’s banner year for sanctions. That May, he withdrew the U.S. from the Iran nuclear deal and unilaterally reimposed all Obama-era sanctions on Tehran under the tagline “maximum pressure.” While Iran’s economy tottered as businesses fled the market to avoid U.S. penalties, the sanctions failed to achieve their goals. Without international support or a clear strategy, Iran rebuilt its nuclear program and retaliated with proxy attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq and drone strikes on Saudi oil facilities.
Read the full article on POLITICO.
More from CNAS
-
Who Will Make Money on AI?
Reports
Executive Summary The private sector is playing a leading role in advancing the frontier of artificial intelligence (AI). As a result, commercial incentives are likely to have...
By Geoffrey Gertz & Emily Kilcrease
-
USTR Hearing on Section 301 Investigations into Structural Excess Capacity
Congressional Testimony
On May 5, 2026 Emily Kilcrease, Senior Fellow and Director of the Energy, Economics, and Security Program at CNAS testified at the Office of the United States Trade Representa...
By Emily Kilcrease
-
The UAE Wants a Dollar Lifeline
Podcast
Rachel Ziemba joins The Indicator to discuss the relationship between the U.S. and the UAE in terms of investment. Listen to the full interview on The Indicator | Planet Money...
By Rachel Ziemba
-
President Trump Wants to Be Able to Sell the Iran War as a Win
Video
Rachel Ziemba, founder of Ziemba Insights and adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, says that investors should look beyond the ending of the Iran wa...
By Rachel Ziemba
