December 06, 2024
How the Chip War Could Turn Under Trump
What does the return of Donald Trump imply for the global chip war? Trump didn’t start the subsidy race — credit here goes to Chinese leader Xi Jinping — but his first administration focused the US on tech competition with China. Biden then extended Trump-era policies regarding tariffs, subsidies, and export controls. Now Trump is returning just as artificial intelligence intensifies demand for computing power.
For the chip industry, the immediate focus is tariffs. Trump’s first term drove the sector towards a costly supply chain restructuring, with electronics assembly shifting from China to Mexico and south-east Asia. More tariffs on China are certainly coming. But some south-east Asian countries whose electronics exports have driven higher trade surpluses with the US are also in the crosshairs.
If the new Trump administration wants to reset chip policy — and if it wants visible results within four years — it had better start soon.
Yet not every US chip company opposes every type of tariff. To protect industry segments impacted by heavily subsidised Chinese competitors, Washington is exploring “component tariffs” — that is, taxing imports based not on the location of final assembly but on the components inside. Today, a device assembled in Vietnam containing Chinese chips pays the tariff rate for Vietnam, not China. A component-based tariff regime would target Chinese chips, regardless of where final assembly occurs. Such a policy would fit Trump’s desire to tackle Chinese subsidies with more limited cost to companies and consumers than broad-based tariffs.
Export controls on US companies shipping AI chips and chipmaking tools to China were another Biden expansion of a Trump-initiated policy. It was Trump who first targeted Huawei. The Biden administration has since cut exports to over a hundred companies it says are Huawei-affiliated. It was Trump who worked with the Dutch government to ban sales of cutting-edge lithography machines to China; Biden expanded those restrictions.
Read the full article on Financial Times.
More from CNAS
-
Commentary
Technology & National Security
CNAS Insights | American AI Exports Need a Sovereignty SolutionEarlier this month, the Department of Commerce opened applications for the American AI Exports Program, an ambitious effort to deploy American AI technology, tools, and infras...
By Ruby Scanlon & Vivek Chilukuri
-
Commentary
Technology & National Security
How the Pentagon Can Manage the Risks of AI WarfareTo use AI effectively, militaries will need to not only harness the promise of AI but also grapple with its limitations and risks....
By Paul Scharre
-
The Long Tail of the Hormuz Energy Crisis with Rachel Ziemba
Podcast
Emily is joined by Rachel Ziemba, CNAS adjunct senior fellow and energy markets expert, to unpack the ongoing energy crisis resulting from the U.S.-Iran military conflict and ...
By Emily Kilcrease & Rachel Ziemba
-
India First Debate: Daniel Silverberg and Sandeep Unnithan on U.S. Rescue Op and Iran Air Defence
Video
In this episode of India Today, anchor Gaurav Sawant discusses a high-stakes US special forces mission deep inside Iran. Joined by Daniel Silverberg, Managing Director of Caps...
By Daniel Silverberg
