December 02, 2025

When Defense Becomes Destruction: Austria-Hungary’s Mistake and Ukraine’s Risk

This article was originally posted on War on the Rocks.

The southeastern Polish city of Przemyśl, with its elegant 19th century Habsburg-era train station, remains one of the principal gateways to war-torn Ukraine. I pass through it regularly on my way to Ukraine, never missing a chance to visit the statue of the good soldier Švejk on one of the town’s squares. Over a hundred years ago, in the first months of World War I, this at-the-time multinational city in the northeastern corner of the Austro-Hungarian Empire became the center of military operations on the Eastern Front, site of the largest and bloodiest siege of the war, and an illustration of the upsides and downsides of dogged static, positional defense — the usual approach of the underdog — and that contingency is the ultimate arbiter of its effectiveness. It holds a valuable lesson for the ongoing fighting in Ukraine.

A “no step back” defense posture by Ukrainian forces risks worsening the relative attrition rate between Ukrainian and Russian forces.

Przemyśl was the most important bulwark in the Empire’s East, with a single mission. In the event of war with Russia, it was meant to protect the passes into the Carpathian Mountains from which a Russian invader could march into the Hungarian plains, on to Budapest, and knock the Dual Monarchy out of the war. The idea was simple: Russia would have more men and materiel available and likely attempt to steamroll Austrian forces with its sheer mass and push back the frontline. In such an event, with the frontline being pushed back and Austrian forces retreating under pressure, Przemyśl was supposed to serve as a bulwark tying down significant Russian forces and buying Austria-Hungary time.

Read the full article on War on the Rocks.

  • Podcast

    Transatlantic Security / Middle East Security

    Europe’s View on Operation Epic Fury

    On February 28, the United States launched Operation Epic Fury, a major military campaign against Iran carried out alongside Israeli strikes. The opening wave targeted Iranian...

    By Andrea Kendall-Taylor & Jim Townsend

    • March 5, 2026
  • Commentary

    Defense

    Deterrence at Scale

    Introduction From the Punic Wars to Franco-Prussian competition in the Renaissance to World War II, history is replete with examples of when industrial capacity—not simply tac...

    By Jennifer McArdle

    • March 5, 2026
  • Commentary

    Defense / Middle East Security

    Iran, Israel, and the U.S. Are Racing the Clock

    This article was originally published in Foreign Policy. At first glance, the Israeli-U.S. attack on Iran is an uneven fight. The United States and Israel have overwhelming ai...

    By Franz-Stefan Gady

    • Foreign Policy
    • March 4, 2026
  • Reports

    Defense

    Eyes in the Sky

    Executive Summary In the Department of Defense’s priority scenarios—a “defense by denial” of China and homeland defense—dedicated airborne sensing and battle management aircra...

    By Philip Sheers

    • March 3, 2026

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia