August 15, 2025
America Should Rent, Not Sell, AI Chips to China
This article was originally published on RAND.
President Trump announced Monday that Nvidia will pay the U.S. government 15 percent of the revenue it derives from sales of its H20 chip to China—an unusual arrangement that gives up leverage. The United States could do better: Rather than selling AI chips, the United States should instead rent them to China to permanently maintain its AI chip edge.
Controversy surrounding NVIDIA's China-specific H20 AI chip has reignited debate over chip exports to China. Proponents of H20 exports argue that sales keep China dependent on U.S. technology while generating revenue. They claim denying access would only accelerate China's drive for homegrown alternatives. These arguments miss a superior alternative to selling chips that would yield similar benefits to the United States: providing China with the computing power it seeks for a fee via remote cloud access
Selling AI chips to China outright reduces America's AI lead for little benefit.
When the United States sells chips, they're gone forever—disappearing into data centers with unknown users pursuing unknown goals. There's another option: give users the computing power of chips remotely. Cloud services offer almost everything chip sales promise, plus actual control: access can be shut off at any stage (PDF) as geopolitical conditions change or threats arise. The economics are better too. AI chips are sold to U.S. cloud providers, who generate additional revenue by renting AI chips to China—creating two revenue streams instead of one. Companies like Amazon and Microsoft already serve global customers this way, maintaining physical possession of the chips while providing computational power on demand.
Unlike physical chip exports, cloud access makes it significantly harder for customers to redirect access to unauthorized parties. Know-your-customer requirements enable monitoring for connections to Chinese military entities. Cloud access also creates continuous leverage—every renewal becomes a negotiation opportunity, compared to chips that get replaced only every three to four years.
Read the full article on RAND.
More from CNAS
-
Reports
Technology & National Security
Red LinesChinese advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems pose a serious and growing threat to U.S. national security. At least seven Chinese developers now produce systems with f...
By Daniel Remler
-
Commentary
Technology & National Security
Taiwan Is the Key to AI DominanceA country determined to win the defining technological race of the century can’t allow its chief rival to control the industrial base on which that race depends....
By David Feith
-
Reports
Technology & National Security
American AI Companies Can’t Get Enough ChipsIn 2026, artificial intelligence (AI) chip production has become a binding constraint on the pace of the AI compute buildout. Demand for computing power to train and deploy ad...
By James Sanders, Janet Egan & Rory Madigan
-
Reports
Technology & National Security
Off TargetThe pace of progress in frontier artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities shows no sign of slowing. Frontier models offer transformative potential for national security—from ...
By Caleb Withers, Jay Kim & Ethan Chiu
