April 08, 2026
Continuing Crisis in Strait of Hormuz: Why Iran’s Hold is Illegal and U.S. Military Force Alone Fails
This article was originally published in Just Security.
Over a month into the conflict between Israel, Iran, and the United States, Iran has shown no sign of losing its capacity to control the Strait of Hormuz. Although the United States has agreed to a two-week suspension of strikes against Iran, Tehran continues to exercise de facto control over the Strait of Hormuz. Iran’s Foreign Minister has declared that vessels seeking to transit the Strait must coordinate directly with Iranian armed forces, subject to unspecified “technical limitations”—a posture that amounts to a unilateral assertion of sovereign authority over one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints. Meanwhile, President Trump has pledged that the United States “will be helping with traffic buildup in the Strait,” but that commitment remains undefined, and it is far from certain whether U.S. naval forces will play any role. Since the conflict started, Iran has rerouted commercial shipping through Iranian territorial waters and imposed a $2 million transit fee—an illegal “Tehran toll booth.” The fragile ceasefire does not appear to dismantle that arrangement.
Iran has drawn explicit lessons from this disruption and is now seeking to institutionalize its control.
At the outset of the conflict, I analyzed the key legal and operational issues in the Strait of Hormuz, assessing that the Strait’s closure would provide Iran with enormous strategic leverage. One month in, that assessment has grown considerably darker. Iran has proven it can deny transit at an acceptable cost to itself—and no plausible U.S. military option can reliably reverse that in the near term. Iran has been weakened militarily, but remains far from defeated. Indeed, Iran has demonstrated the capacity to launch strikes hundreds of miles from its territory while shooting down a U.S. F-15E Strike Eagle, one of the most sophisticated aircraft in the American arsenal.
Read the full article in Just Security.
More from CNAS
-
Modernize States’ Legislative Efforts on Unsanctioned Militias While Protecting Constitutional Rights
Commentary
Matt Gimovsky is senior corporate counsel at Kroll and an Army JAG with active-duty experience in administrative law and with the trial defense service....
By Matt Gimovsky
-
Blurring the Line
Commentary
Mark Nevitt is currently an associate professor of law at Emory University School of Law and a CNAS adjunct senior fellow....
By Mark Nevitt
-
Five “Blockades” and One Legal Problem: Naval Enforcement in the U.S.–Iran Conflict
Commentary
The Pentagon should clarify, with precision, the legal authorities underpinning each maritime enforcement action....
By Mark Nevitt
-
Masked and Anonymous
Commentary
David Aaron is a former Manhattan assistant district attorney and Department of Justice national security and cyber prosecutor. He is now in private practice at an AmLaw 50 la...
By David Aaron
