May 05, 2026
Experts Make Their Picks for Acquisition Reform Litmus Tests
This article was originally published on National Defense.
The real question with acquisition reform is not whether the Pentagon can move fast when it absolutely has to — it can — but whether it can do so consistently, across programs and over time. Senior leaders can bend and push the acquisition process, as they did with Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles, when there is an urgent need. But the average acquisition timeline needs to decline significantly, so that fielding fast and upgrading frequently becomes the norm rather than the exception.
If the department cannot pass these easy tests, there is little reason to believe it will do well on the harder ones.
As tests, I would examine three cases where the technology is already proven and there is no major development risk: Army small uncrewed aerial systems acquisition, cheap long-range missiles and one-way attack drones, and counter-UAS systems for mobile forces.
Read the full article on National Defense.
More from CNAS
-
Beyond Reshoring
Introduction Over the past several years, Congress and the Trump and Biden administrations have made significant efforts to reverse America’s atrophying manufacturing capabili...
By Diem Salmon
-
Franz-Stefan Gady on Why It’s So Hard to Judge Progress or Advantage in Modern Conflict
Franz-Stefan Gady, a defense analyst and consultant in Vienna who is also an adjunct fellow with Center for a New American Security think tank and author of several books incl...
By Franz-Stefan Gady
-
CNAS Insights | The Golden Dome Needs a Strategy
Join us for the CNAS 2026 National Security Conference: New Rules, on Thursday, June 11!...
By Kalena Blake
-
Sec. Pete Hegseth Criticized over D-Day Immigration Speech
Becca Wasser joined CNN | This Morning to discuss the speech given by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to European allies on the anniversary of D-Day. "That moment was not fo...
By Becca Wasser
