July 21, 2025

Rethinking the Global AI Race

This article was originally published on Just Security.

The global competition over artificial intelligence is increasingly framed in stark and dramatic terms, often compared to the Manhattan Project, a new arms race, or a moonshot project requiring incredible resources to attain a difficult, if not, impossible goal. These analogies all suffer from a common flaw: they point us toward the wrong goal. AI is not a discrete project with a clear endpoint, like building a nuclear weapon or landing on the moon. It is a long-term, society-wide effort to develop powerful tools and ensure their benefits reach classrooms, battlefields, factories, and start-ups alike.

The country that leverages advances in AI to establish and maintain substantial economic and military advantages will not necessarily be the one that develops the most advanced models in the shortest amount of time. The United States is not going to win the AI race against China, for example, simply because U.S.-made OpenAI models beat Chinese-made DeepSeek or Kimi K2 models on capability benchmarks. Instead, countries that learn how to bridge the gap between invention and widespread societal adoption will reap the most crucial benefits in the long term.

The United States must stop running as if this were only a 100-meter dash and start acting like a strategic marathoner: moving with urgency, clarity, and sustained commitment.

By taking a longer view, the United States can make smarter decisions about how to align technological progress with national security and public welfare. If it continues to frame AI primarily as a short-term sprint toward technical milestones, it risks falling behind global peers and adversaries.

Gaining and maintaining a long-term competitive advantage in AI will require more than technical superiority. It demands reorienting education and workforce training, modernizing institutions, and setting a national vision based on broad public engagement. By adopting this strategy, the United States can accomplish what other countries may struggle to replicate: a whole-of-society approach to AI.

Read the full article on Just Security.

  • Reports

    Technology & National Security

    Red Lines

    Chinese advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems pose a serious and growing threat to U.S. national security. At least seven Chinese developers now produce systems with f...

    By Daniel Remler

    • June 12, 2026
  • Commentary

    Technology & National Security

    Taiwan Is the Key to AI Dominance

    A country determined to win the defining technological race of the century can’t allow its chief rival to control the industrial base on which that race depends....

    By David Feith

    • The Wall Street Journal
    • May 14, 2026
  • Reports

    Technology & National Security

    American AI Companies Can’t Get Enough Chips

    In 2026, artificial intelligence (AI) chip production has become a binding constraint on the pace of the AI compute buildout. Demand for computing power to train and deploy ad...

    By James Sanders, Janet Egan & Rory Madigan

    • May 7, 2026
  • Reports

    Technology & National Security

    Off Target

    The pace of progress in frontier artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities shows no sign of slowing. Frontier models offer transformative potential for national security—from ...

    By Caleb Withers, Jay Kim & Ethan Chiu

    • March 24, 2026

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia