February 26, 2025

International Governance of AI

Ruby Scanlon, research assistant for the Technology and National Security Program at the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), partook in a panel which discussed the complex interplay between geopolitics and the international governance of AI, emphasizing how national strategic interests and power dynamics — particularly between technologically advanced nations like the US and China — overshadow regulatory considerations.

Watch the full panel on Northwestern University - Engineering News.

Reports

Technology & National Security
Red Lines
Chinese advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems pose a serious and growing threat to U.S. national security. At least seven Chinese developers now produce systems with f...

By Daniel Remler
- June 12, 2026
Commentary

Technology & National Security
Taiwan Is the Key to AI Dominance
A country determined to win the defining technological race of the century can’t allow its chief rival to control the industrial base on which that race depends....

By David Feith
- The Wall Street Journal
- May 14, 2026
Reports

Technology & National Security
American AI Companies Can’t Get Enough Chips
In 2026, artificial intelligence (AI) chip production has become a binding constraint on the pace of the AI compute buildout. Demand for computing power to train and deploy ad...

By James Sanders, Janet Egan & Rory Madigan
- May 7, 2026
Reports

Technology & National Security
Off Target
The pace of progress in frontier artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities shows no sign of slowing. Frontier models offer transformative potential for national security—from ...

By Caleb Withers, Jay Kim & Ethan Chiu
- March 24, 2026