A New Strategic Framework for Advancing U.S. Interests in the Economic Relationship with China

Today, rising security concerns have become a defining feature in the U.S.-China economic relationship. Heightened tensions over trade, investment, and regulatory restrictions on both sides have turned economic competition into a worrisome source of instability, with global geopolitical and economic repercussions. In this context, it is imperative that the United States develop a strong, pragmatic strategy for advancing its economic and security interests in the complex and consequential economic relationship with China. This research project seeks to guide policymakers as they develop a new strategic framework that serves the core economic and security interests of the United States.

As part of this research endeavor, the CNAS report—Disorderly Conduct: How U.S.-China Competition Upended the International Economic Order and What the United States Can Do to Fix Itargues that the primary objective of the United States should be to lead in the creation and maintenance of a new global economic order in which the efficiency and innovation of open markets are pursued side by side with the establishment of new norms for government interventions. To achieve this, the United States should have clearly defined areas of interests as related to hard power, resilience, and commercial engagements.

Resetting the global economic order to account for today’s geopolitical reality is no easy task, and doing so requires the United States to overcome hurdles both at home and in collaboration with allies. With this series of publications, we hope to lay the intellectual groundwork for addressing these challenges, helping policymakers as they navigate foreseeable turbulence in the U.S.-China economic relationship.

Read the Report

Energy, Economics & Security

Disorderly Conduct

The United States must develop a strong, pragmatic strategy for advancing its economic and security interests within the U.S.-China economic relationship, accounting for the f...

Read More

Expert Analysis

Commentaries and op-eds from experts engaged in the project.

Related CNAS Research

Energy, Economics & Security

Containing Crisis

As the United States and China seek to manage an increasingly tense relationship, both sides have turned to coercive economic statecraft as a core part of their broader foreig...

Energy, Economics & Security

Sanctions by the Numbers: SDN, CMIC, and Entity List Designations on China

The United States has progressively expanded the scope of sanctions and entity-based export controls on Chinese persons (i.e., individuals and entities), primarily through the...

Energy, Economics & Security

America’s China Strategy Has a Credibility Problem

An effective U.S. sanctions strategy should play to U.S. strengths in the financial sector while reserving the most severe measures for acute crises or conflicts....

Energy, Economics & Security

The Illusion of Controls

The case of semiconductors illustrates how countries cannot easily weaponize interdependence, especially when it comes to supply chains....

Energy, Economics & Security

How to Win Friends and Choke China’s Chip Supply

U.S. officials should prioritize aligning controls with other major producer nations to target the most significant technology chokepoints and the areas where the risk of back...

Subscribe

Stay up-to-date with the Energy, Economics & Security team at CNAS.