January 13, 2014

After the Awakening: Future Security Trends in the Middle East

By Jacob Stokes

December 2013 marked three years since the beginning of the Arab Awakening. The tumult of the last three years has rocked the region and beyond. And the coming year promises continued upheaval in the region.

To try to get a handle on what the coming year holds, I have written a policy brief entitled “After the Awakening: Future Security Trends in the Middle East” laying out what I see as the seven most important security trends in the region.

The seven trends are:

1. Enduring U.S. interests but doubts about American commitment

2. The political-economic nexus of instability

3. The Iranian nuclear question: conclusion or conflict?

4. Regional geopolitics in flux

5. The changing nature of the terrorist threat

6. Little progress towards Israeli-Palestinian peace

7. The transforming energy map and outside powers

These trends will have profound implications for U.S. interests. Two major themes – changes in structure and the importance of contingency – will characterize the interaction among these issues in the years ahead. The longstanding structure of strategic relations in the region is changing, and Middle Eastern publics will continue to play a larger role. In addition, several key events, including the Iranian nuclear issue, the Syrian civil war and the Israeli-Palestinian issue, could push regional stability and Washington’s involvement in the region in drastically different directions. Thus, contingency will play a determining role in the future of the region.

The bottom line: For the United States, the Middle East is, and will remain, a vitally important region. But advancing U.S. interests in the region – never easy – will become even more complicated in the years ahead. To read the whole paper, click here.

  • Commentary
    • The Washington Post
    • March 19, 2020
    9/11 swallowed U.S. foreign policy. Don’t let the coronavirus do the same thing.

    For two decades, American foreign policy has been shaped by the 9/11 attacks. The catastrophic wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, our failure to see the full threat posed by Russia...

    By Ilan Goldenberg

  • Commentary
    • Foreign Policy
    • March 6, 2020
    Big Ideas for NATO’s New Mission in Iraq

    Following U.S. President Donald Trump’s calls for America’s allies to “get more involved in the Middle East,” NATO defense ministers last month agreed to “enhance” the Atlanti...

    By David H. Petraeus & Vance Serchuk

  • Commentary
    • Defense One
    • February 21, 2020
    The American Public Wants a Sustainable Middle East Policy

    After the U.S. strike on Qasem Soleimani, Americans feared the United States was on the brink of war with Iran. “World War III draft” memes circulated around the internet, and...

    By Kaleigh Thomas & Emma Moore

  • Commentary
    • The New York Times
    • February 12, 2020
    The Iranian Missile Strike Did Far More Damage Than Trump Admits

    Over 100 American soldiers have been treated for traumatic brain injuries following Iran’s missile strike on Al Asad Air Base in western Iraq. The strike came in retaliation f...

    By Loren DeJonge Schulman & Paul Scharre

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia