Sometime on Monday the world population grew to 7 billion
people, according to the United Nations.
billion population is a challenge, and at the same time, an opportunity,
depending upon how the international community prepares for that challenge,” U.N.
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told a news conference in New York on Monday.
It is interesting to reflect on what a world with 7 billion
people means against the backdrop of global climate change. Yesterday, the Associated Press reported on the findings of a draft report from
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that
cautioned that weather extremes could become worse as the world warms, making
disasters like the 2010 Russian heat wave and the ongoing drought in Texas and
the American Southwest more the norm than the extreme.
warming isn’t the sole villain in future climate disasters, the climate report
says,” according to the Associated
even bigger problem will be the number of people – especially the poor – who
live in harm’s way.”
It is clear that the world is shrinking. But in addition to
a growing population, more and more people – especially in developing states – are
moving from rural to coastal areas in order to take advantage of burgeoning
cities and faster economic growth taking place along the world’s coastline. However, these people are in harm’s way. Indeed,
this migration toward the littoral regions is forcing people to live in more
dense communities in vulnerable areas that may be more susceptible to severe storms
and sea level rise, the kinds of challenges likely to manifest from global
CNAS Senior Fellow Robert Kaplan described
this phenomenon in his book, Monsoon:
The Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power:
Although the rate at
which world population grows continues to drop, the already large base of
population guarantees that absolute rises in the number of human beings have
never been greater in countries that are most at risk. This means that over the
coming decades more people than ever before, in any comparable space of time
save for a few periods like the fourteenth century during the Black Death, are
likely to be killed or made homeless by Mother Nature.
Bangladesh, for example, is a state where these demographic, environmental
and climate change trends may collide. Kaplan wrote in Monsoon that, “With
150 million people living packed together at sea level, the lives of many
millions in Bangladesh are affected by the slightest climatic variation, let
alone by the dramatic threat of global warming.” Moreover, the consequences for the United
States could be stark, according to Kaplan: “The U.S. Navy may be destined for
a grand power balancing game with China in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, but it
is more likely to be deployed on account of an environmental emergency, which
is what makes Bangladesh and its problems so urgent.”
World leaders need to remain vigilant and continue to integrate
these demographic and environmental trends into their planning efforts in order
to stave off major disasters. As U.N.
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said on Monday, there is an opportunity for the
world to manage this challenge. In
particular, countries like the United States are in a good position to help
vulnerable developing countries adapt to global climate change. In the littoral
regions, for example, the U.S. Navy should continue to take proactive measures
and partner with other militaries to develop robust search and rescue and
disaster relief capabilities. Moreover,
the U.S. public and private sector can share experiences and best practices with
developing states about how to develop infrastructure that can withstand
increased sea level rise and more intense and frequent storms.
The bottom line is that U.S. leaders and others need to
think critically about the inextricable linkages between demographic,
environmental and climate change trends in order to take advantage of the
opportunities they present, rather than have to confront the challenges that await