August 08, 2014

Your War, Mr. President

The evening of August 7, President Barack Obama did something that he could never have imagined doing in the second year of his second term:  authorizing U.S. military combat action in Iraq.  Elected in no small part to end President George W. Bush's "dumb war" in Iraq, Obama took pride in having removed all American troops from that country two and a half years ago, at the end of 2011.  His announcement that he was authorizing humanitarian aid drops and air strikes in Iraq was deeply ambivalent, absolutely necessary, and an entirely predictable result of poor choices made late in his first term – choices not to retain a residual force of combat advisers in Iraq and not to train and equip the rebels fighting against President Bashar al Assad in Syria in the summer of 2012.  As a result of those decisions to forfeit American influence in Syria and Iraq, the worst actors in both countries rose to power, creating a powerful radical Islamist state that poses a clear and present danger to America's friends in Baghdad, Erbil and throughout the Middle East.

In his announcement, the president promised that "As commander in chief, I will not allow the United States to be dragged into fighting another war in Iraq."  Dropping bombs from airplanes is, of course, an act of war; the United States is not fighting another war in Iraq, but the same one that began in 1990, escalated dramatically in 2003, and did not end with the departure of American troops in 2011.  Wars do not magically end when the United States redeploys ground troops from the combat theater; they end when the political objectives of the combatants are achieved, or when the combatants acknowledge that their goals are unachievable.  When we stopped fighting,  our enemies gained heart from our departure, regrouped and redoubled their effort to good effect, and now we are back fighting them again.  Defeating them now will be far harder and more costly, in blood and treasure, than would have been preventing their rise to power in the first place.

    • Commentary
    • Politico
    • September 7, 2016
    How to increase the pressure on the Syrian government

    Five years into Syria’s bloody civil war, it is clear that there is no appetite in Washington or European capitals for a more muscular military intervention to stop the Assad ...

    By Peter Harrell

    • Commentary
    • Foreign Policy
    • September 1, 2016
    Al Qaeda Is Gaining Strength in Syria

    The struggle for Aleppo poses an awful threat for the United States. The ongoing battle for what was once Syria’s second-largest city has united two of the most prominent oppo...

    By Nicholas Heras

    • Commentary
    • May 22, 2016
    Fighting Terrorism in Syria: It's More Than ISIS

    The fact of the matter is that although the United States has provided military assistance to individual Syrian armed opposition groups led by “trusted commanders” since 2012,...

    By Nicholas Heras

    • Commentary
    • May 10, 2016
    From the Bottom, Up: A Strategy for U.S. Military Support to Syria’s Armed Opposition

    As negotiations continue to uphold a teetering ceasefire in Syria, Center for a New American Security (CNAS) Middle East Security Program researcher Nicholas Heras has written...

    By Nicholas Heras

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia