February 06, 2025
A World Safe for Prosperity
How America Can Foster Economic Security
U.S. President Donald Trump jolted the global economy this past weekend when he announced sweeping tariffs on Canada, China, and Mexico, the United States’ three largest trading partners. Although most of these levies were ultimately delayed after a frantic few days of negotiations, Trump’s actions confirmed what his campaign rhetoric had led observers to believe: that tariffs, whether implemented or threatened, will be central to his foreign policy. The moves sparked outcry from industry leaders and economists, who cited the risks of crippled supply chains and higher prices for American consumers and companies. It was a strategic misstep from an administration faced with the opportunity to reshape the rules of the global economy to benefit U.S. national security.
The global economic order, comprising multilateral institutions such as the World Trade Organization as well as regional and bilateral trade and investment agreements, has grown stagnant and no longer advances the United States’ most important concerns. Economic security—the idea that the government should more assertively intervene in the world economy to improve resilience and address national security risks—has emerged as perhaps the central objective of U.S. international economic policy. The United States and other countries increasingly fear that economic interdependence can make them vulnerable to adversaries and susceptible to wider shocks; Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, in 2022, put this weakness into stark relief. Protecting the U.S. economy from these dangers has become an area of bipartisan consensus in Washington, as evident in a suite of policies enacted during the past two administrations, including sanctions, supply chain reviews, sweeping export controls, and restrictions on both outbound investments and flows of sensitive data.
Read the full article from Foreign Affairs Magazine.
More from CNAS
-
Marco Rubio Is Rebooting the Neocons for the MAGA Era
Commentary
This article was originally published in Bloomberg. In his infamous guide to ruling, Niccolò Machiavelli also offers a warning to ambitious advisers: Power belongs to the pri...
By Chris Kennedy
-
CNAS Insights | Why the United States Needs Economic Coercion Doctrine
Commentary
Economic tools now sit at the center of U.S. global competition. Sanctions, export controls, investment restrictions, and financial measures are employed with a frequency and ...
By LtCol Mary Hossier
-
Commentary
Transatlantic Security / Energy, Economics & Security
Want to Stop Trump Bullying Your Country? RetaliateThis article was originally published in The Guardian. In February of last year, Donald Trump convened the first full cabinet meeting of his second term in the White House. He...
By Edward Fishman
-
Unpacking the Trump Administration’s Plans for Venezuela’s Oil Revenue
Commentary
This article was originally published in Lawfare. Since removing Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro from power, President Trump has made clear that he intends to “get the oil...
By Alex Zerden
While the Trump administration has ignited a series of trade conflicts during its first weeks in office, it has also signaled an interest in launching negotiations for new trade deals. In an article for Foreign Affairs, Geoffrey Gertz and Emily Kilcrease provide a blueprint for rethinking U.S. trade policy to center the economic security priorities that governments are most concerned with today. Working with close allies and partners, the Trump administration should pursue new economic security agreements that combine aligning defensive tools such as export controls and investment restrictions with efforts to lower trade barriers in key sectors. This approach will empower the United States to more effectively address the economic and security risks from China and other adversaries and lay the foundation for a long overdue renewal of the global economic system.