July 02, 2019

Acting or Not, the Play’s The Thing

By Loren DeJonge Schulman

The musical chairs of “acting” officials at the Defense Department has taken on a dizzying pace. Army Secretary Mark Esper became the acting defense secretary after Patrick Shanahan, the previous acting defense secretary withdrew his nomination for the permanent job. Esper’s move left a gap in Army leadership that needed to be filled, so Army Undersecretary Ryan McCarthy has been tapped as acting Army secretary, leaving his position open. And so, the Army general counsel will fill in for McCarthy. But, they’re not alone. The Pentagon, and the Trump administration more broadly, is littered with “acting” officials.

Cue the pundits, politicians and prior appointees, who have led the charge condemning President Donald Trump’s preference for “acting” officials. Each justifies their critique by arguing that having permanent presidential appointees in place would automatically lead to better governance, namely politically informed policy implementation and more opportunity for congressional oversight. This would be a logical measure in any typical administration. But in many aspects this administration is not typical, and emphasis on the growth and length of vacancies may detract from an assessment of the real failures of the Trump administration’s policy process and oversight gaps. Whether officials are acting or not is ultimately less important than if governance can proceed seamlessly, transparently and with accountability.

Read the full article in Just Security.

  • Reports
    • July 28, 2021
    From Mardi Gras to the Philippines

    Introduction As it approaches 20 years since its creation, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is due for substantial updates in order to improve its ability to adapt t...

    By Carrie Cordero & Katie Galgano

  • Commentary
    • Defense News
    • July 26, 2021
    The US Army’s new iron triangle: The coming budget crunch and its implications for modernization

    Each side of the iron triangle comes with its own implications for doctrine, force structure, readiness, posture and modernization....

    By Billy Fabian

  • Podcast
    • July 23, 2021
    Defining the China Challenge: The Future of the U.S. Navy

    On this episode of Chain Reaction, Aaron speaks with Chris Dougherty, senior fellow for defense at CNAS and the co-lead of the CNAS gaming lab, about a recent article he wrote...

    By Chris Dougherty

  • Podcast
    • July 23, 2021
    Defense & Aerospace Podcast

    Becca Wasser joins the Defense & Aerospace Report weekly roundtable to discuss topics of the week including the defense budget. Listen to the full conversation from Defense &...

    By Becca Wasser

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia