Image credit: U.S. Army

July 02, 2019

Acting or Not, the Play’s The Thing

By Loren DeJonge Schulman

The musical chairs of “acting” officials at the Defense Department has taken on a dizzying pace. Army Secretary Mark Esper became the acting defense secretary after Patrick Shanahan, the previous acting defense secretary withdrew his nomination for the permanent job. Esper’s move left a gap in Army leadership that needed to be filled, so Army Undersecretary Ryan McCarthy has been tapped as acting Army secretary, leaving his position open. And so, the Army general counsel will fill in for McCarthy. But, they’re not alone. The Pentagon, and the Trump administration more broadly, is littered with “acting” officials.

Cue the pundits, politicians and prior appointees, who have led the charge condemning President Donald Trump’s preference for “acting” officials. Each justifies their critique by arguing that having permanent presidential appointees in place would automatically lead to better governance, namely politically informed policy implementation and more opportunity for congressional oversight. This would be a logical measure in any typical administration. But in many aspects this administration is not typical, and emphasis on the growth and length of vacancies may detract from an assessment of the real failures of the Trump administration’s policy process and oversight gaps. Whether officials are acting or not is ultimately less important than if governance can proceed seamlessly, transparently and with accountability.

Read the full article in Just Security.

  • Commentary
    • February 8, 2023
    Sharper: Critical Technology

    Critical technologies promise to upend traditional understandings of national security, economic prosperity, and everyday life. Artificial intelligence, semiconductors, quantu...

    By Anna Pederson & Sam Howell

  • Commentary
    • January 25, 2023
    Sharper: National Security in a Divided Congress

    Following the 2022 midterm elections, a new U.S. Congress was sworn in, resulting in a divided House and Senate with narrow margins. Key national security legislative items ar...

    By Anna Pederson & Cameron Edinburgh

  • Commentary
    • Breaking Defense
    • January 20, 2023
    The Siren Song: Technology, JADC2, and the Future of War

    Winning future wars will not be about maintaining information advantage but rather prevailing when neither side has the advantage. And that is not a war that can be won by new...

    By Andrew Metrick

  • Commentary
    • January 11, 2023
    Sharper: Integrated Deterrence

    The belated 2022 National Defense Strategy—released in October of last year—identified integrated deterrence as the cornerstone of the strategy. Integrated deterrence calls fo...

    By Anna Pederson & Michael Akopian

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia