December 02, 2022
At $60, the Cap on Oil Prices Will Build Pressure on Russia
The international effort to impose costs on Russia for its invasion of Ukraine is nearing a major milestone: the first major sanctions on oil trade. A long-planned European Union embargo on purchasing and facilitating shipments of Russian seaborne crude is set to come into effect on Monday. Just days before implementation, EU nations finally coalesced on the price—$60 per barrel—needed to trigger an exemption to that embargo. The so-called price cap will allow the sale of Russian oil to other countries using Western services. Coming so close to implementation, companies will take time to assess compliance and wait to see how Russia responds. While the deal is unlikely to cut Russia’s revenues sharply, the compromise is likely to add to the gradually increasing pressure on Russia’s economy and, policy makers hope, to do so in a way that limits ruptures between the Western allies.
With the price cap, the G7 hopes that Russia’s war machine continues to hurt more than the global economy.
Reaching agreement on the price reduces the risk that millions of barrels of Russian oil would struggle to find buyers in the coming months or enter a growing black market and potentially incentivize the swift development of non-G7 service channels. It also avoids an even bigger public rupture within the EU and G7 over the admittedly divergent policy goals of the oil sanctions, namely, to keep oil flowing and cut Russia’s revenues. Until last week, the EU had been considering a higher figure of $65-70 per barrel. But that price risked failing to meaningfully cut Russian revenues, was a less-attractive carrot for buyers (such as China and India) to partly comply, and implied a lot of increased due diligence and monitoring for a smaller payoff. Countries including Poland were calling for a price as low as $20.
Read the full article from Barron's.
More from CNAS
-
Ziemba: China Could Impose Retaliatory Tariffs on U.S.
If tariffs and costs continue to rise, it will not be great for oil demand within the US, that's according to Rachel Ziemba, Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Center for a New Amer...
By Rachel Ziemba
-
Trump’s Treasury and Commerce nominations + Nippon Steel’s bid for U.S. Steel
Emily and Geoff react to the nominations of Scott Bessent for U.S. Treasury Secretary and Howard Lutnick for U.S. Commerce Secretary and overall point man for trade and tariff...
By Emily Kilcrease & Geoffrey Gertz
-
Sharper: Trump 2.0
Donald Trump's return to the White House is widely expected to reshape America's global priorities. With personnel choices and policy agendas that mark a significant break fro...
By Charles Horn & Gwendolyn Nowaczyk
-
Trump 2.0's Economic Security Agenda
Emily and Geoff switch from obsessing over the election to obsessing over the transition. They dig into what a Trump 2.0 presidency will mean for tariffs, sanctions, export co...
By Emily Kilcrease & Geoffrey Gertz