December 02, 2022
At $60, the Cap on Oil Prices Will Build Pressure on Russia
The international effort to impose costs on Russia for its invasion of Ukraine is nearing a major milestone: the first major sanctions on oil trade. A long-planned European Union embargo on purchasing and facilitating shipments of Russian seaborne crude is set to come into effect on Monday. Just days before implementation, EU nations finally coalesced on the price—$60 per barrel—needed to trigger an exemption to that embargo. The so-called price cap will allow the sale of Russian oil to other countries using Western services. Coming so close to implementation, companies will take time to assess compliance and wait to see how Russia responds. While the deal is unlikely to cut Russia’s revenues sharply, the compromise is likely to add to the gradually increasing pressure on Russia’s economy and, policy makers hope, to do so in a way that limits ruptures between the Western allies.
With the price cap, the G7 hopes that Russia’s war machine continues to hurt more than the global economy.
Reaching agreement on the price reduces the risk that millions of barrels of Russian oil would struggle to find buyers in the coming months or enter a growing black market and potentially incentivize the swift development of non-G7 service channels. It also avoids an even bigger public rupture within the EU and G7 over the admittedly divergent policy goals of the oil sanctions, namely, to keep oil flowing and cut Russia’s revenues. Until last week, the EU had been considering a higher figure of $65-70 per barrel. But that price risked failing to meaningfully cut Russian revenues, was a less-attractive carrot for buyers (such as China and India) to partly comply, and implied a lot of increased due diligence and monitoring for a smaller payoff. Countries including Poland were calling for a price as low as $20.
Read the full article from Barron's.
More from CNAS
-
Transatlantic Security / Energy, Economics & Security
From Russia with RiskHere on the Bear Market Brief, a lot of what we focus on is, simply put, risk: what might happen, and what might it mean? On this episode, Rachel Ziemba, an adjunct senior fel...
By Rachel Ziemba
-
Richard Nephew on the U.S. military strikes on Iran’s nuclear program
Richard Nephew, expert on sanctions and Iran’s nuclear program, joins Emily and Geoff to discuss the long history of U.S. policy towards Iran, the role of sanctions in constra...
By Emily Kilcrease & Geoffrey Gertz
-
Energy, Economics & Security / Technology & National Security
Beyond Bans: Expanding the Policy Options for Tech-Security ThreatsStuck between a rock (the fact that banning all Chinese tech that poses a risk is expensive and impractical) and a hard place (the fact that many existing mitigation proposals...
By Geoffrey Gertz
-
Indo-Pacific Security / Energy, Economics & Security
75 Years Post-Korean War: Can Trust Be Rebuilt Under the New Administration?As President Lee Jae Myung begins his term, he's taking visible steps to reset the tone with North Korea: halting propaganda broadcasts and reemphasizing past military agreeme...
By Dr. Go Myong-Hyun