The bilateral security agreement was a necessary step toward long-term stability in Afghanistan, but it is not sufficient by itself. Without it, however, Afghanistan would have virtually no chance for stability for two important reasons.
First, the Afghan National Security Forces are not yet capable of maintaining security throughout the country without the assistance of U.S. forces. Their capabilities at the small unit level have improved considerably in the past few years, but they still face challenges operating in larger, combined arms formations. And they still depend on key, U.S. enabling capabilities, including close air support, logistics and casualty evacuation. If the bilateral security agreement had not been signed, all U.S. forces would have had to leave Afghanistan by the end of the year – and the enemies of the new government in Kabul, including the Taliban, would have certainly launched an offensive against the weakened Afghan forces. The resulting conflict would have intensified the fighting in areas where it is already occurring. And it likely would have further spread instability and conflict throughout the rest of the country.
More from CNAS
Sharper: The Budget
The defense budget and its $715 million price tag accounts for much of the U.S. government's discretionary spending every year, but where will (and should) this money go in th...
By Anna Pederson
Three elements of Army’s iron triangle equally critical for United States, says defense analyst
Billy Fabian, adjunct senior fellow for the Defense Program at the Center for a New American Security and senior analyst at Govini discusses the Army's iron triangle on Govern...
By Billy Fabian
The Fiscal Year 2022 Defense Budget and Future Options for the Pentagon
Submitted Written Testimony I. Introduction Chairman Smith, Ranking Member Rodgers, distinguished members of the committee and staff thank you for inviting me to testify today...
By Stacie Pettyjohn
Risky Business: Future Strategy and Force Options for the Defense Department
To consider the next defense strategy and the tradeoffs associated with different options, we developed three possible strategies—high-end deterrence, day-to-day competition, ...
By Stacie Pettyjohn, Becca Wasser & Jennie Matuschak