September 19, 2017
Congress must reassert itself on use of military force
Last Wednesday the Senate quietly rejected a proposal by Kentucky Senator Rand Paul to rescind the 2001 and 2002 Authorizations for the Use of Military Force (AUMF), which would have forced Congress to take a clear stance on the president’s actions overseas.
The Senate’s decision closely follows the announcement of President Trump’s new strategy for the war in Afghanistan, which was notably light on details and lacking in measures of success. By voting “no” on Senator Paul’s amendment, the Senate continues to abdicate their constitutional role in U.S. foreign policy, allowing the president to deploy American forces to places like Afghanistan without accountability.
Read the full op-ed in The Hill.
More from CNAS
-
Europe’s Dangerous Hesitation on Its Own Air Defense
Commentary
A NATO that credibly signals that it will not only attempt to defend against incoming missiles but also shoot the archer would strengthen deterrence, preventing war in the fir...
By Franz-Stefan Gady
-
The Ambiguity Spiral in Iran
Commentary
But on the whole, the best way for the United States to settle the war with Iran is to be clearer about its objectives....
By Erik Lin-Greenberg
-
Can the U.S. Win a War in the Pacific Against China?
Podcast
We sit down with former U.S. Navy submariner and defense analyst Thomas Shugart, now an adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, to examine the rapidly...
By Tom Shugart
-
Video
Defense / Energy, Economics & Security
Defense Stocks Strain as Conflict WidensBecca Wasser and Chris Kennedy, adjunct senior fellows at the Center for a New American Security, join Bloomberg This Weekend to discuss the Iran War and the its impact on U.S...
By Becca Wasser & Chris Kennedy
