In matters of peace and war, no one seems satisfied with Congress. Over the past two decades of conflict and despite its formal powers to declare wars, appropriate funds, and organize the armed forces, Congress has largely deferred and used more of a rhetorical fight than actively shaping American wars. But it need not be this way.
By exercising its informal influence, meaning everything other than legislating, members of Congress can test prewar intelligence and define likely costs and benefits.
Members on both sides of the aisle have sought a greater voice on national security matters. Since 2019, bipartisan groups condemned the killing of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, punished Russia for a range of bad behaviors, and sought limitations on U.S. force drawdowns in Syria and South Korea. Congress voted to invoke the War Powers Resolution for the first time, attempting to curtail U.S. intervention in Yemen, and this spring passed legislation to require legislative approval for war with Iran.
These examples of renewed congressional activism are striking, but their actual effects have been highly limited. Presidential vetoes, disputes over renewing authorizations for the use of military force, and insufficient support for new oversight mechanisms have together frustrated many attempts to legislate the course of American conflicts. While Congress should continue to pursue legislative means, it is the body’s relatively neglected informal toolkit that stands as the likelier path to influence.
Read the full article in The Hill.
More from CNAS
ReportsCongress’s Hidden Strengths
Introduction On matters of peace and war, virtually no one seems satisfied with Congress. Constitutionally coequal to the executive, the Congress often appears more an uneasy ...
By Richard Fontaine & Loren DeJonge Schulman
CommentaryFor House, Senate National Security Committees, Stopgaps for Term Limits
The primary election season for the next Congress opens officially on March 3, as states from California to Arkansas begin counting votes for candidates vying for seats in the...
By Chris Estep
CommentaryThe Nonintervention Delusion
Richard Fontaine addresses the most frequently expressed concerns about U.S. military interventions and concludes that the use of military force will remain a key component of...
By Richard Fontaine
CommentaryThere’s Still Time to Protect American Democracy Against Threats to the 2020 Elections
The importance of protecting the integrity of the vote—the very foundation of democratic governance—could not be clearer....
By Carrie Cordero & Claire Finkelstein