December 28, 2021

Europe’s antitrust policy shouldn’t ignore China

Europe has a well-earned reputation for regulating Big Tech, taking the lead on privacy, data protection and especially competition. Now, new antitrust legislation that introduces criteria to identify large online “gatekeepers” is winding its way through the European Parliament. But while the Digital Markets Act is expected to target a number of U.S. tech companies, if used strategically the DMA — and European antitrust and competition policy writ large — can also be a tool to compete with China.

In the past few years, Europe has slowly awakened to China’s challenge to transatlantic technology leadership. Although many Europeans are slowly converging on Washington’s threat perceptions, Europe still lacks the tools and political will to address challenges emanating from Beijing’s juggernauts.

While the Digital Markets Act is not wrong to keep U.S. tech companies accountable, it is an opportunity for Europe to use antitrust and competition policy to recalibrate an approach to the China challenge that fits European perceptions and strengths.

While transatlantic policy responses to China should be aligned, they need not be the same. The United States and Europe should leverage their respective strengths and toolboxes to combat China’s market distorting practices in the technology sphere. And Europe should bring its comparative advantage — developing and enforcing competition policy — to bear to compete with China, beginning with the DMA.

Beijing’s tech giants are competing for size and control of the global technology ecosystem — a dynamic the transatlantic partners cannot afford to ignore. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has set the goal of market domination for their largest technology companies. To achieve this goal, the CCP is engaged in anti-competitive behavior to improve their companies’ market positions. In addition to state subsidies, the CCP often provides sweetheart deals to companies to improve their market standing.

Read the full article from TechCrunch.

  • Commentary
    • January 20, 2025
    Address NATO at the Munich Security Conference

    President Trump has an opportunity to address tensions with NATO at the Munich Security Conference.While he should articulate his grievances, he also should lay out his requir...

    By Jim Townsend

  • Podcast
    • January 17, 2025
    Canada, Trump, and the Post-Trudeau Era

    In just a few days, Donald Trump returns to office with Canada in his sights. At the same time, it has been less than two weeks since Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau re...

    By Andrea Kendall-Taylor & Elizabeth Anderson

  • Commentary
    • Foreign Affairs
    • January 17, 2025
    Trump’s Threat to U.S. Intelligence

    The key for intelligence officials will be to avoid distraction and find a way to stay focused on the core missions....

    By Peter Schroeder

  • Commentary
    • European Leadership Network
    • January 13, 2025
    In Russia's Perceived War with the West, Arms Control is Collateral Damage

    Russia seemingly perceives previously established arms control agreements as elements of the broader Western-dominated political and security order that it aims to overturn....

    By Nicholas Lokker

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia