Image credit: White House State of the Union Gallery

June 30, 2019

INF Treaty Defenders Raise the Risk of Nuclear War

A dangerous plan to ban research and development of intermediate-range conventional weapons.

By Elbridge Colby and Rep. Mike Gallagher

President Trump last year announced the U.S. would withdraw from the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. That made sense because Russia was violating the pact and China, which was not a signatory, had exploited it to undermine the U.S. conventional military edge in Asia.

Some in Congress who objected to Mr. Trump’s decision are trying to nullify it by defunding conventional weapons covered by the soon-to-be defunct treaty. The House voted largely on party lines last month to zero out research and development for conventional intermediate-range missiles. If they prevail, it will heighten the risk of nuclear war.

The best way to reduce the chance of nuclear confrontation with great-power competitors is by having conventional forces able to repel any invasion of U.S. allies, and conventional ground-based missile systems would help. Nor would they undermine any efforts to manage nuclear risks. The original INF pact was essentially about nuclear weapons; conventional missiles were included largely for verification reasons. The R&D funding the House zeroed out wasn’t even prohibited under the treaty.

Read the full article in The Wall Street Journal.

  • Commentary
    • February 8, 2023
    Sharper: Critical Technology

    Critical technologies promise to upend traditional understandings of national security, economic prosperity, and everyday life. Artificial intelligence, semiconductors, quantu...

    By Anna Pederson & Sam Howell

  • Commentary
    • Breaking Defense
    • January 20, 2023
    The Siren Song: Technology, JADC2, and the Future of War

    Winning future wars will not be about maintaining information advantage but rather prevailing when neither side has the advantage. And that is not a war that can be won by new...

    By Andrew Metrick

  • Commentary
    • January 11, 2023
    Sharper: Integrated Deterrence

    The belated 2022 National Defense Strategy—released in October of last year—identified integrated deterrence as the cornerstone of the strategy. Integrated deterrence calls fo...

    By Anna Pederson & Michael Akopian

  • Video
    • January 3, 2023
    What Is the Purpose of the American “Brigade 101” Conducting Military Exercises in Romania?

    Michael Akopian, Research Assistant at the Center for a New American Security joined Now Asharq to discuss the purpose of U.S. Military exercises in Romania. Listen to the f...

    By Michael Akopian

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia