September 14, 2016
Leaving the “Gray Zone”: The U.S. Need to Fight Aggression Below Conventional War
The Commander-in-Chief Forum featuring Secretary Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump’s thoughts on national security missed an opportunity to engage the candidates on the gray zone tactics China and Russia are using to advance their agendas. Gray zone tactics represent asymmetric actions of many forms that do not trigger a robust adversarial response while still generating strategic gains. These states have acquired territory and expanded their influence, both politically and the physical range of their advanced weaponry, using “salami slicing” in recent years. Deterring these tactics requires comprehensive strategies. Gray zone tactics will be one of the most daunting policy challenges facing the next President of the United States. The next President, regardless of party, must have a plan.
To read the full op-ed, visit the Small Wars Journal website.
More from CNAS
-
Preserving U.S. Military Advantage Amid Rapid Technological Change
We live in a period of tremendous technological change. This disruption creates opportunities for the United States but also for our adversaries. To sustain its battlefield ad...
By Paul Scharre
-
The history and evolution of drones and their use in modern warfare
Stacie Pettyjohn joins BBC Newshour to discuss how drones continue to shape and change the modern battlefield. Listen to the full episode and more from BBC Newshour....
By Stacie Pettyjohn
-
Drones Are Transforming the Battlefield in Ukraine but in an Evolutionary Fashion
Thus far in Ukraine, drone warfare has been an evolution, not a revolution....
By Stacie Pettyjohn
-
Networked deterrence in a multipolar Indo-Pacific
For integrated deterrence to succeed in the Indo-Pacific, the United States needs to bolster both deterrence by denial and resilience by working with allies and partners....
By Becca Wasser