March 24, 2021
Merchant Crypto Payments: A New National Security Frontier
Last month, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC), the agency that enforces U.S. sanctions, announced it had reached a half a million dollar settlement with cryptocurrency payment processor firm BitPay, a U.S. company. OFAC had been investigating BitPay for allegedly processing payments to merchants from customers in sanctioned jurisdictions. This announcement got scant public attention, even among cryptocurrency industry watchers, but it is a glimpse into thorny regulatory challenges ahead as large, mainstream corporations are jumping into the crypto space and pushing for more people to use digital assets in commerce. Much of this steady rush into retail crypto activity is occurring without a check of the regulatory blindspots ahead.
The BitPay settlement also points to how illicit actors might adjust their strategies to circumvent anti-money laundering, combatting the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) and sanctions compliance requirements. As people’s lives become more digital and businesses become more open to cryptocurrencies, U.S. law enforcement and national security personnel may find that illicit financial activity increasingly involves crypto payments.
Much of this steady rush into retail crypto activity is occurring without a check of the regulatory blindspots ahead.
The business model for cryptocurrency payment processors like BitPay is straightforward. These companies provide software allowing retail merchants to accept cryptocurrencies as payment online or in brick-and-mortar establishments. The merchants do not need to handle cryptocurrencies directly. The payment processor owns the software wallets with which customers pay using Bitcoin or some other cryptocurrency, and then the processor converts those funds into regular fiat currency. The processor company then sends those converted funds to the merchant, minus a commission. This financial activity makes the payment processor a money transmitter under U.S. law and obligates it to follow all AML/CFT and sanctions regulations.
According to OFAC, BitPay failed in sanctions compliance. While BitPay screened its merchant clients to ensure they were not on the U.S. sanctions list or operating in sanctioned countries, the company for five years did not prevent individuals in sanctioned locations such as Crimea, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria from purchasing from U.S. merchants via BitPay’s crypto payment platform. Thus, it enabled customers in these locations to evade sanctions and transact with U.S. businesses.
Read the full article from Lawfare.
More from CNAS
-
The Real Impact of SCOTUS's Tariff Hearing with Kathleen Claussen
Podcast
Kathleen Claussen, Professor of Law at Georgetown University, joins Emily and Geoff to discuss the SCOTUS case on Trump's tariffs. They share their insights from the recent SC...
By Emily Kilcrease & Geoffrey Gertz
-
The Future of IEEPA Tariffs with Geoffrey Gertz
Podcast
On November 5, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument on the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by President Donald Trump to im...
By Geoffrey Gertz
-
Economic Security in North America
Commentary
Executive Summary In its request for comment, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) solicits comments on and recommendations for “specific actions [to promote] al...
By Emily Kilcrease & Geoffrey Gertz
-
How Sanctions Became a Way to Wage War and When They Actually Work, with Eddie Fishman
Podcast
In this episode of “Financial Crime Matters,“ Kieran Beer talks with Eddie Fishman, CNAS adjunct senior fellow and author of “Chokepoints: How the Global Economy Became a Weap...
By Edward Fishman
