November 21, 2021

Polar Bear in the Room: America Must Talk to Russia About the Arctic

By Nicholas Lokker

As tensions between Russia and the West rise, it is imperative that they do not spill over into the Arctic. While the Arctic remained a relative oasis of cooperation for many years, there has been a recent uptick in militarization as climate change has raised the region’s perceived economic value. For the United States and European Arctic nations, Russia’s expanding military infrastructure and activity in the Arctic poses an acute security risk. To manage competition in the region, there is a need for greater military-to-military communication among all Arctic nations.

The United States and its European allies now find themselves in the dangerous position of having little opportunity to directly discuss Arctic military security with Russia, raising the chances of conflict due to miscalculation.

Russia increasingly views the Arctic as critical to both its security and prosperity. Melting sea ice has presented new economic opportunities by increasing the viability of the Northern Sea Route, yet it has simultaneously left the Russian coast more vulnerable. The region’s new priority status is reflected in the Kremlin’s recent decision to upgrade the Northern Fleet to a full-fledged military district, as well as its construction of new military bases on islands in the Arctic Ocean. Russia’s Arctic military buildup has also included the deployment of advanced radar and air defense systems throughout the region.

In addition to bolstering its military infrastructure, Moscow has stepped up the activity of its armed forces in the Arctic. Umka-21, held this past spring, was Russia’s most elaborate Arctic military exercise to date, demonstrating new capabilities such as the ability to simultaneously surface three nuclear submarines from below the ice. Additionally, in 2020 the U.S. Air Force in Alaska intercepted more Russian aircraft than at any time since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Finally, Russia has engaged in disruptive activity below the threshold of conflict, for example by jamming GPS signals during the November 2018 NATO Trident Juncture exercise.

Read the full article from The National Interest.

  • Podcast
    • September 30, 2022
    The Italian Elections, with Nathalie Tocci and Cecilia Sottilotta

    This past weekend, voters in Italy went to the polls for national parliamentary elections. As expected, the elections resulted in a victory for the alliance led by Giorgia Mel...

    By Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Jim Townsend, Nathalie Tocci & Cecilia Sottilotta

  • Commentary
    • September 28, 2022
    Sharper: NATO

    As the war in Ukraine pushes past the six-month mark, NATO stands at a critical juncture. In the face of renewed great-power competition in Europe, the alliance has proved to ...

    By Anna Pederson & Michael Angeloni

  • Commentary
    • Tablet
    • September 28, 2022
    Russia’s Great Transformational Failure

    While post-communist countries saw varying degrees of success, it is the failure to modernize along all three dimensions that distinguishes Russia....

    By Maria Snegovaya

  • Commentary
    • Internationale Politik Quarterly
    • September 28, 2022
    Future-Proofing Transatlantic Relations (II): Taking Advantage of the 2023 Window of Opportunity

    The time to lock in progress in the transatlantic relationship is now....

    By Carisa Nietsche

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia