November 21, 2021

Polar Bear in the Room: America Must Talk to Russia About the Arctic

By Nicholas Lokker

As tensions between Russia and the West rise, it is imperative that they do not spill over into the Arctic. While the Arctic remained a relative oasis of cooperation for many years, there has been a recent uptick in militarization as climate change has raised the region’s perceived economic value. For the United States and European Arctic nations, Russia’s expanding military infrastructure and activity in the Arctic poses an acute security risk. To manage competition in the region, there is a need for greater military-to-military communication among all Arctic nations.

The United States and its European allies now find themselves in the dangerous position of having little opportunity to directly discuss Arctic military security with Russia, raising the chances of conflict due to miscalculation.

Russia increasingly views the Arctic as critical to both its security and prosperity. Melting sea ice has presented new economic opportunities by increasing the viability of the Northern Sea Route, yet it has simultaneously left the Russian coast more vulnerable. The region’s new priority status is reflected in the Kremlin’s recent decision to upgrade the Northern Fleet to a full-fledged military district, as well as its construction of new military bases on islands in the Arctic Ocean. Russia’s Arctic military buildup has also included the deployment of advanced radar and air defense systems throughout the region.

In addition to bolstering its military infrastructure, Moscow has stepped up the activity of its armed forces in the Arctic. Umka-21, held this past spring, was Russia’s most elaborate Arctic military exercise to date, demonstrating new capabilities such as the ability to simultaneously surface three nuclear submarines from below the ice. Additionally, in 2020 the U.S. Air Force in Alaska intercepted more Russian aircraft than at any time since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Finally, Russia has engaged in disruptive activity below the threshold of conflict, for example by jamming GPS signals during the November 2018 NATO Trident Juncture exercise.

Read the full article from The National Interest.

  • Podcast
    • January 28, 2022
    Flash Release: Ben Hodges Reacts to U.S.-NATO Response

    The United States and its NATO allies have begun pursuing other courses of action to the Russia-Ukraine crisis besides diplomacy, including decisions to put military forces on...

    By Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Jim Townsend & Lieutenant General (Retired) Ben Hodges

  • Video
    • January 26, 2022
    Andrea Kendall-Taylor on Russia-Ukraine Tensions

    Former senior intelligence officer Andrea Kendall-Taylor, now a fellow at the Center for a New American Security, talked about growing tensions between the U.S. and Russia ove...

    By Andrea Kendall-Taylor

  • Video
    • January 25, 2022
    U.S. Plans For Russia Amid Fears Of Attack

    In addition to putting U.S. troops on heightened alert, the White House has outlined its economic plans to deter Russia from invading Ukraine. Jim Townsend joins Jay Strubberg...

    By Jim Townsend

  • Podcast
    • January 25, 2022
    Flash Release: Constanze Stelzenmüller and Jana Puglierin React to Germany’s Approach to Ukraine

    The strength of Germany’s support for Ukraine and the overall cohesion of NATO has come under question after Germany blocked Estonia from sending German-made howitzer artiller...

    By Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Jim Townsend, Jana Puglierin & Constanze Stelzenmüller

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia