September 17, 2021
Reassessing Counter Terrorism Financing in a Taliban-Controlled Afghanistan
The Taliban’s rapid takeover of Afghanistan set back decades-long efforts to integrate Afghanistan into the international community. Nowhere is this more apparent than on anti-money laundering and countering-the-financing-of-terrorism (AML/CFT) reforms, a policy area in which Afghanistan made substantial progress over the past several years to raise compliance standards and crack down on major vulnerabilities in its economy, particularly the under-regulated hawala money transfer system.
Now, the Taliban, a group sanctioned by the United Nations, the United States, and other international partners, oversees Afghanistan’s enforcement of AML/CFT and economic sanctions. The Taliban is unlikely to meaningfully enforce United Nations sanctions against itself or crackdown against the hawala industry in the same way as the previous government. As a former senior Treasury Department official recently noted, “I can’t think of any case in which a terrorist group that’s already designated became the power in charge of a full country.”
The Taliban’s rapid takeover of Afghanistan set back decades-long efforts to integrate Afghanistan into the international community.
Particularly after the Islamic State-Khorasan’s (ISIS-K) tragic and brazen attack at the Kabul airport that killed 13 U.S. military personnel along with over 160 Afghan civilians, the Taliban must be held responsible for allowing terrorist groups to operate in Afghanistan. Addressing AML/CFT risks presents one concrete way for the international community to measure the Taliban’s actions rather than its rhetoric in addressing terrorism and terrorism financing.
Understanding Afghanistan’s post-9/11 economic history allows policymakers to better address the current crisis.
After decades of conflict and the Taliban’s prior five-year rule (1996-2001), Afghanistan’s formal financial system was “virtually non-existent,” according to a 2003 World Bank study. Instead, it relied (and still relies) heavily on hawala, a centuries-old informal money exchange system that provides for both domestic and international transfers. According to The Economist, “regulators around the world hate the system, because of its opacity and its role in helping to fund terrorism.”
Read the full article from Just Security.
More from CNAS
-
U.S.-China Trade Talks Return to ‘Fragile Ceasefire’ – Former China Director
Video
The United States and China say they've reached a "framework agreement" to avoid another 100% US tariff on Chinese goods. Officials have even been hinting of a trade breakthro...
By Liza Tobin
-
How to Choke Your Enemy: Why America Turned the World Economy into Its Weapon of Global Domination
Podcast
Edward Fishman, adjunct senior fellow at CNAS, joined host Andrew Keen to discuss how America has turned the world economy into its weapon of global domination. In his bestsel...
By Edward Fishman
-
Trump Hits Russian Oil with ‘Tremendous Sanctions’
Video
We are now learning that President Donald Trump’s Treasury Department will sanction Russia’s two largest oil producers, Rosneft and Lukoil. According to Trump, this continues ...
By Edward Fishman
-
Tariffs Are a Weaker Weapon than Trump Thinks
Commentary
This article was originally published in Financial Times. This past summer, Donald Trump’s faith in tariffs appeared vindicated. He sealed lopsided trade deals with the EU, Ja...
By Edward Fishman
