September 14, 2022
Sand in the silicon: Designing an outbound investment controls mechanism
Read the full report from The Atlantic Council Economics Statecraft Initiative.
Recent congressional efforts to establish new authorities to regulate outbound investment have revived a long-simmering debate in Washington about the economic and security risks associated with US investment in China. The stakes for rethinking the investment relationship between the United States and China are high. China is the world’s second-largest economy and second-largest destination for foreign investment, after the United States. US firms have $118 billion in investments there. While foreign companies are increasingly pessimistic about the geopolitical risks associated with operating in China, the majority intend to stay in the market.
To ensure that new authorities are consistent with the United States’ commitment to open markets, support the global competitiveness of US business, and can be implemented effectively, an outbound investment mechanism must be narrowly targeted, clearly defined, non-duplicative of existing tools, scoped proportionately to administrative capacity, and paired with meaningful multilateral engagement with allies and partners.
Key policy recommendations include:
- Define a clear policy mandate.
- Focus outbound investment review authorities on slowing indigenous technology capabilities in China.
- Limit government action to those investments that present national security risks that cannot be adequately addressed under existing authorities.
- Implement a phased approach to outbound investment.
Phase one:
- Mandate notifications of a broad scope of outbound investments to better inform policymakers technology that meets technical specifications for items under US arms embargo.
- Disincentivize US investors from contributing to indigenous technology development in China by expanding the non-SDN Chinese Military-Industrial Complex (CMIC) list to target entities operating in critical sectors of concern, providing forward guidance on what limited set of critical technologies will result in a CMIC listing, and strengthen Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) disclosure rules so that US investors must be more publicly transparent about their investments in China.
- Establish mirror-image investment controls for investments in Chinese companies developing technology that meets technical specifications for items under US arms embargo.
- Adopt a general policy of cross-listing entities placed on the Entity List and those on an expanded CMIC.
Phase two:
- Mandate investment screening for US investments in Chinese semiconductor entities, focusing on “smart money” investments made in chip design, fabrication, electronic design-automation software, and manufacturing equipment.
- Engage diplomatically with partners and allies to foster their development and implementation of similar, complementary mechanisms.
Download the Full Report
More from CNAS
-
Principles and Policy Options for Designing Better Investment Barriers
Congressional Testimony
This testimony focuses on options for designing an effective program to address the national security risks that can arise from certain U.S. investments in countries of concer...
By Emily Kilcrease
-
U.S. Economic Security Strategy, Authorities, and Bureaucratic Capacity
Congressional Testimony
Watch:...
By Emily Kilcrease
-
Comments on Provisions Pertaining to U.S. Investments in Certain National Security Technologies and Products in Countries of Concern
Commentary
Submitted by: Sarah Bauerle Danzman (Associate Professor, Indiana University Bloomington; Senior Fellow, Atlantic Council), Tim Fist (Fellow, Technology and National Security ...
By Emily Kilcrease, Tim Fist, Sarah Bauerle Danzman, Ngor Luong & Emily Weinstein
-
Sharper: Economic Statecraft
Commentary
As competition between the United States and China escalates, and the war in Ukraine continues, countries have embraced new forms of economic statecraft to accomplish key fore...
By Anna Pederson & Charles Horn
