America’s artificial intelligence industry is increasingly likely to face government regulations that could blunt innovation. There is a perfect storm brewing on Capitol Hill, and in statehouses and city governments around the country. Growing unease over possible negative impacts of AI on American society, and increased awareness that technological developments are outpacing lawmakers’ ability to craft rules and provide oversight is likely to lead to well-intentioned but poorly-crafted regulations that will constrain research, development and deployment of AI technologies.
In the absence of government regulations, several leading voices in AI development advocate for industry self-regulation. While commendable in its ultimate goal — instilling trust in AI — it is not a viable long-term solution. Government oversight is necessary and, done right, will make America’s AI endeavors more effective and competitive. The U.S. regulatory principles for AI proposed by the White House on Jan. 7 are intended to do exactly that.
Read the full article in the San Francisco Chronicle.
More from CNAS
TranscriptTranscript from Artificial Intelligence and the Role of Confidence-Building Measures
On March 5, 2021, the CNAS Technology and National Security Program hosted a virtual discussion on AI and the role of confidence-building measures. This event is a part of the...
By Paul Scharre, Helen Toner, Michael Horowitz & Kerstin Vignard
CommentaryA Solid Plan to Compete with China in Artificial Intelligence
This report is about more than AI....
By Megan Lamberth & Martijn Rasser
ReportsAI and International Stability: Risks and Confidence-Building Measures
Exploring the potential use of confidence-building measures built around the shared interests that all countries have in preventing inadvertent war....
By Michael Horowitz & Paul Scharre
CommentaryLandmark artificial intelligence legislation should become law
AI will touch every sector — from agriculture to healthcare, to transportation to national security....
By Tony Samp