September 23, 2019

The Most Dangerous Moment of the Trump Presidency

By Richard Fontaine

For all of the uncertainty of the Trump administration’s nearly three years in power, genuine international crises have been rare. That’s changing right now. The attack a week ago on Saudi Arabia’s massive Abqaiq oil field took offline half of the country’s oil production – some five percent of global output. The drone and missile salvo has the hallmarks of Tehran, and with top administration officials pointing to Iranian culpability, the world is watching to see if and how the United States responds. It’s the most dangerous moment of the Trump presidency thus far.

Not so long ago, a devastating attack on Saudi oil supplies would have almost certainly elicited an American military response. Ensuring the continued flow of energy from the Middle East was widely seen as critical, one of the vital American interests that nearly all policymakers believed worth defending. Fracking and the reduced U.S. dependence on Middle East oil, the exhaustion and caution borne of two decades of American wars, a new focus on great power competition, and the complexities of recent diplomacy with Iran have changed all this to a degree.

But only to a degree. Oil prices spiked after the Abqaiq attack, and while they have settled down for now, a new assault could roil them again and harm the American economy. The U.S. defense of Gulf allies, while enshrined in no mutual defense treaty, has been a general feature of America’s approach to the region since at least the first Gulf War. The attack on Saudi critical infrastructure was inarguably the kind of military aggression Washington wishes not to see repeated. And it follows a summer of hostile actions against tankers in the Gulf of Oman and the shooting down of an American drone.

Read the full article in The Atlantic.

  • Commentary
    • February 3, 2021
    Sharper: Iran

    While President Biden has publicly committed to reengaging Iran, his administration faces immediate challenges....

    By Kaleigh Thomas, Chris Estep & Cole Stevens

  • Commentary
    • The National Interest
    • January 19, 2021
    Could Europe’s INSTEX Help Save the Iran Nuclear Deal?

    Supporting INSTEX would illustrate not only that “America is back,” but that the Biden administration is taking humanitarian concerns seriously without sacrificing security in...

    By ​Francis Shin

  • Commentary
    • December 16, 2020
    Sharper: 2020

    2020 featured an ever-evolving series of national security challenges....

    By Sam Dorshimer, Nathalie Grogan, Emily Jin, Chris Estep & Cole Stevens

  • Podcast
    • December 4, 2020
    How the US could return to the Iran nuclear deal

    The election of Joe Biden presents an opening to strengthen transatlantic diplomacy on Iran. Biden has already outlined his intention to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran, primaril...

    By Ilan Goldenberg

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia