October 30, 2019
The Travel Rule Is Not Enough If Crypto Gets Adopted
Last week, at a large fintech conference in Washington, DC, the head of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the arm of the U.S. Treasury Department that enforces anti-money laundering (AML) laws, gave a grave warning to the cryptocurrency space. FinCEN Director Kenneth Blanco stressed that any company that claims its technology can not comply with current AML regulations will not be able to do business in U.S. jurisdiction. However, because the crypto space is evolving faster than regulators, such warnings are not enough to address the scope of money laundering and terrorist financing risk that is likely to arise if cryptocurrencies become a common form of retail payment.
Blanco was specifically talking about complying with the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), the statute that all banks and money service businesses must follow in order to hinder illicit financial flows. The BSA requires financial institutions to implement various controls and file various reports with FinCEN to flag activities that may indicate money laundering.
The FinCEN director was also referring to crypto firms’ need to follow the “travel rule,” a BSA requirement for money transmitters to record identification information on all parties in fund transfers between financial institutions. Many in the crypto space have been up-in-arms about the travel rule requirement because cryptocurrency transfers do not intrinsically capture personal identification data. Slowly, however, the industry is contemplating various solutions to help crypto exchanges to identify users on both ends of a transfer.
Read the full article in Forbes.
More from CNAS
-
2026 Summer Reading List from Derisky Business
On Derisky Business, the economic security podcast from the Center for a New American Security, we like to ask all our guests to recommend their favorite books listeners shoul...
By Emily Kilcrease, Geoffrey Gertz & Eleanor Hume
-
Ziemba: Iran Looking to Monetize & Weaponize Hormuz
Oil steadied after falling more than 3% in previous sessions following early progress in peace talks over the Iran war. A US waiver allows some sales from Iran, offering them ...
By Rachel Ziemba
-
Are the 301 Tariffs Really About Forced Labor? with Josh Kagan
Josh Kagan joins Emily and Geoff to give the big picture behind recent U.S. tariffs related to forced labor, as well as providing an insider’s view on the future of trade and ...
By Emily Kilcrease & Geoffrey Gertz
-
Trump’s Replacement Tariffs Will Have Unintended Consequences for USMCA
Ultimately, this is a choice between two models of economic leadership. One relies on rules, predictability, and partnership. The other leans on discretion, leverage, and shor...
By Emily Kilcrease
