October 30, 2019
The Travel Rule Is Not Enough If Crypto Gets Adopted
Last week, at a large fintech conference in Washington, DC, the head of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the arm of the U.S. Treasury Department that enforces anti-money laundering (AML) laws, gave a grave warning to the cryptocurrency space. FinCEN Director Kenneth Blanco stressed that any company that claims its technology can not comply with current AML regulations will not be able to do business in U.S. jurisdiction. However, because the crypto space is evolving faster than regulators, such warnings are not enough to address the scope of money laundering and terrorist financing risk that is likely to arise if cryptocurrencies become a common form of retail payment.
Blanco was specifically talking about complying with the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), the statute that all banks and money service businesses must follow in order to hinder illicit financial flows. The BSA requires financial institutions to implement various controls and file various reports with FinCEN to flag activities that may indicate money laundering.
The FinCEN director was also referring to crypto firms’ need to follow the “travel rule,” a BSA requirement for money transmitters to record identification information on all parties in fund transfers between financial institutions. Many in the crypto space have been up-in-arms about the travel rule requirement because cryptocurrency transfers do not intrinsically capture personal identification data. Slowly, however, the industry is contemplating various solutions to help crypto exchanges to identify users on both ends of a transfer.
Read the full article in Forbes.
More from CNAS
-
Video
Indo-Pacific Security / Energy, Economics & Security
Trump Unfriends Modi's India: Trump Frothing, India CalmFrom tariffs to tantrums-Trump's latest anti-India tirade stirs global concern. As Washington watches in disbelief, Shiv Aroor discusses what this "break-up" means for India-U...
By Daniel Silverberg
-
Commentary
Indo-Pacific Security / Energy, Economics & Security / Technology & National Security
Selling AI Chips Won’t Keep China Hooked on U.S. TechnologyU.S. policy should not rest on the illusion that selling chips can trap China inside the American tech ecosystem....
By Janet Egan
-
Commentary
Energy, Economics & Security / Technology & National Security
What the U.S.-EU $40 Billion Chip Deal MeansThe U.S.-EU framework exemplifies a recurring challenge in modern trade diplomacy: the tension between political symbolism and operational substance....
By Pablo Chavez
-
Podcast
Transatlantic Security / Energy, Economics & Security
LISTEN: Why It’s So Hard to Go After Russia’s Oil RevenueEmily Kilcrease, senior fellow and director of the Energy, Economics, and Security Program at the Center for a New American Security, joins the show to talk about secondary ta...
By Emily Kilcrease
