September 17, 2019

Trump’s Defense Cuts in Europe Will Backfire

By Jim Townsend

Twice this month, the Trump administration moved to walk back critical efforts to strengthen the U.S. military presence in Europe, choosing cheap political points over essential projects and sound policy. First, the White House announced it would cut more than $770 million worth of military construction efforts meant to restore combat capability in Europe and to deter further Russian aggression, in order to divert funds to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border. Second, the United States is hoping to cut a deal with Germany that on its face appears to increase German military spending and decrease the U.S. share of the military burden in Europe but, in reality, serves to weaken the German military while burdening the United States even further. In both cases, the loser is the United States.

The military construction projects on the chopping block include vital aspects of the U.S. scramble to rebuild its ability to fight in Europe. As the U.S. deputy assistant secretary of defense in charge of Europe and NATO when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014, I spent almost every waking moment pushing as much U.S. force structure back into Europe as I could to deter any further aggression by Russian President Vladimir Putin. I know firsthand how essential the projects in question are, and I know for a fact that eliminating them takes away tools the U.S. military needs in case of a conflict, including ammunition storage, runways for combat aircraft, facilities for special operations forces, prepositioned equipment to set up forward air bases, and reinforced shelters for combat aircraft. The projects being cut are not military bands or barber shops but tools of war that would be needed immediately in case of conflict. Deterrence is about not just showing intent to defend your allies, but having the ability to do so. These cuts take away that ability. The U.S. drawdown in Europe at the end of the Cold War helped embolden Putin to invade Georgia and Ukraine, as well as intimidate U.S. allies in the Nordic and Baltic regions. To deter further Russian adventurism in this great power competition, the United States’ ability to respond alongside NATO needs to be restored, and quickly.

Read the full article in Foreign Policy.

  • Podcast
    • November 20, 2020
    The Biden Administration and Europe, with Steven Erlanger

    Steven Erlanger joins Andrea Kendall-Taylor and Jim Townsend to discuss how Europe is reacting to the incoming Biden administration. Erlanger is the chief diplomatic correspon...

    By Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Jim Townsend & Steven Erlanger

  • Commentary
    • November 18, 2020
    Sharper: America's Alliances and Partnerships

    Cooperation with allies and partners is vital for achieving U.S. foreign policy goals, especially with respect to global challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the sprea...

    By Carisa Nietsche, Jeff Cirillo, Chris Estep & Cole Stevens

  • Podcast
    • November 13, 2020
    Youth Voices in Foreign Policy, with Indiana High School Students

    On a special episode of Brussels Sprouts, four high school honors students from Indianapolis join Andrea Kendall-Taylor and Jim Townsend to discuss the future of U.S. national...

    By Andrea Kendall-Taylor & Jim Townsend

  • Video
    • November 9, 2020
    Carisa Nietsche Discusses Transatlantic Cooperation on Government Matters

    On November 9, 2020, Carisa Nietsche, an Associate Fellow with the CNAS Transatlantic Security Program, appeared on Government Matters to discuss a recent roadmap from CNAS an...

    By Carisa Nietsche

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia