February 18, 2022
US, Russia Should Establish Deconfliction Line for Air Operations Over the Black Sea – Now
The Russian threat to invade Ukraine is upending the correlation of forces in Europe, with US and NATO members deploying forces and hardware to bolster the Eastern flank in response to Russia’s military build up. While all eyes are on Ukraine, there are secondary challenges that could emerge in other parts of Europe and may increase the risk of accidental escalation.
The airspace over the Black Sea is one area where dangerous interactions could further heighten tensions, as American and Russian air forces may come into close contact in the skies as the crisis unfolds. The good news is that both Washington and Moscow have an interest in managing these interactions and installing guard rails for air operations in congested environments.
There’s even a model to follow: the two nations should harness lessons learned from air operations in Syria and establish deconfliction mechanisms to ensure that actions over the Black Sea don’t spiral out of control.
The similarities are clear: like Syria, the Black Sea would represent a crowded air space prone to air-to-air interactions with Russian fighters, along with an intact surface-to-air missile threat. Unprecedented numbers of Russian, US, and NATO naval vessels with organic air assets are currently operating in the Mediterranean and Black Sea. Further afield, in the Eastern Mediterranean, Russia has demonstrated it is willing to act aggressively in the skies against US assets, even during this period of heightened tension.
Russia has not yet invaded Ukraine, so a policy of engagement costs the West little, and the potential for a breakthrough incentivizes continued engagement with Moscow. Given the scope of expected American and European sanctions, and the political costs of being seen as appeasing Moscow, once an invasion begins it would be almost impossible to work on such a concept. Given this negative trajectory, it is imperative to find mechanisms for communications now to manage risk and increase transparency.
Read the full article from Breaking Defense.
More from CNAS
-
Where Do We Go from Here?
Commentary
Introduction Over the past nine months, The New American Defense Industrial Base essay series has brought together a wide range of participants to deliver a variety of views o...
By Susanna V. Blume
-
Manufacturing a New National Security
Commentary
Introduction The United States sits atop the world’s pedestal of military superpowers—particularly when it comes to developing and employing the most sophisticated technology—...
By James Swartout & Nick Doucette
-
The Impossible Middle East
Commentary
The Middle East today has some thinking to do. It will need to draw up new ways to preserve its wealth, to pursue greater self-sufficiency, and to diversify—and even own—its s...
By Becca Wasser
-
The Risks of Downplaying China’s Military
Commentary
Deterrence can succeed, and continued U.S., Taiwanese, and allied investment can matter a great deal — if undertaken with the urgency the situation demands....
By Tom Shugart
