February 22, 2022
Why Digital Assets are Poised to Disrupt Philanthropy
Digital asset donations are poised to disrupt — and even transform — philanthropic giving this year. Though there has been much speculation about the viability of cryptocurrency and their use across sectors, charitable organizations such as St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital, American Cancer Society, the Jewish National Fund, World Vision and United Way Worldwide now accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as donations.
In 2020, such donations totaled just US$4.2 million. Crypto giving rose more than 10-fold to $69.6 million in 2021, and this steep trajectory that will likely continue in 2022 suggests a new era of digital asset philanthropy. Charity auctions featuring non-fungible tokens in the last two years have highlighted the fact that NFTs and digital currencies have more utility than trendy headlines. These new technologies can be used as a force for good, and their uptake by influential non-profit organizations will accelerate their acceptance in this sector. Just as digital technology is disrupting traditional methods of stock investing and buying artwork by allowing access by a wider audience, crypto donations provide a tremendous opportunity for charitable organizations.
Nonprofit organizations are naturally risk-averse. But as the digital asset ecosystem matures, many more of them are likely to conclude that they can’t afford not to include clear channels for cryptocurrency donations.
Artwork, access to financial institutions, and charitable giving are only a few of the many opportunities that will be disrupted in this transition to digital currencies. Auctions traditionally serve only a tiny fraction of potentially interested parties. But thanks to the increasing popularity of digital assets like NFTs, online auctions can now attract the attention of millions of previously excluded people and guarantee secure transfer of the auctioned product following purchase. While formidable challenges remain, we see two substantial incentives.
Read the full article and more from Forkast.
More from CNAS
-
Economic Security in Asia Part 1: China's growing pains with Dan Rosen
Dan Rosen, leading expert on China's economy and head of the Rhodium Group's China practice, joins Emily and Geoff to talk about the recently concluded third plenum meetings i...
By Emily Kilcrease & Geoffrey Gertz
-
What a Bunch of Malarkey!
Emily and Geoff discuss the U.S. presidential election and what that might mean for economic security policy. They get into trade policy, what both candidates would do to comp...
By Emily Kilcrease & Geoffrey Gertz
-
How U.S.-China Competition Upended the International Economic Order and What the United States Can Do to Fix It
On June 26, CNAS hosted an event to discuss a new report, Disorderly Conduct: How U.S.-China Competition Upended the International Economic Order and What the United States Ca...
By Emily Kilcrease, Geoffrey Gertz, Adam Tong & Peter Harrell
-
Sanctions by the Numbers: 2023 Year in Review
Executive Summary In 2023, the Biden administration continued to prioritize sanctions as a key tool to support U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives. The United...
By Rowan Scarpino & Jocelyn Trainer