China’s growing defense budget – in addition to its claim of sovereignty in the South China Sea, anti-satellite weapons testing, and interest in cyber military capabilities – has raised questions about the implications of its rising military power, noted Center for a New American Security (CNAS) Fellow Abraham Denmark in congressional testimony to the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission on March 10, 2011. “The question of how China will use its newfound power, especially its military power, will determine the course of the 21st century,” said Denmark.
“China is adopting diplomatic positions and developing a robust military capability that combined could undermine American power projection capabilities," said Denmark. "This may, at a more fundamental level, undermine the same liberal international order that has to date enabled China’s rise. Yet China’s future path is not determined, and the development of a robust Chinese military capability does not inherently threaten the United States or the liberal international order."
Denmark argued that the key for American strategists and policymakers is to understand the present ambiguity surrounding China's military, and build a strategy that encourages a more responsible and productive future for Chinese power while defending American interests against the potential for Chinese aggression. In his testimony, Denmark recommends that the United States:
- Encourage China’s positive contribution to global public goods and find opportunities for cooperation between the U.S. military and the People's Liberation Army.
- Work with ASEAN regarding the South China Sea to develop a common, clear message to send to Beijing about what is, and what is not, acceptable behavior.
- React strongly and decisively when China’s actions violate American interests, undermine global public goods, or threaten regional stability.
- Continue to adjust its military capabilities to counter China’s anti-access area denial capabilities.
- Build the military capacities of its allies and partners throughout the Asia-Pacific and identify new partners in the region.
Download China's Arrival: A Strategic Framework for a Global Relationship, a CNAS report co-authored by Denmark, here.
More from CNAS
PodcastEp. 72: What “China” means in 2020
We take a new look at what China means to American voters, and how opinions and perceptions about China have changed since President Trump took office three and a half years a...
By Kara Frederick
CommentaryThe U.S.-China confrontation is not another Cold War. It’s something new.
With U.S.-China relations in free fall, the Trump administration’s chief arms control negotiator recently proclaimed that "we know how to win these races and we know how to sp...
By Richard Fontaine & Ely Ratner
CommentaryThrones Wreathed in Shadow: Tacitus and the Psychology of Authoritarianism
On May 10, 1626, Sir John Eliot — an English parliamentarian and statesman — delivered a blistering speech to the House of Commons. One of the finest orators of his day, Eliot...
By Iskander Rehman
CommentaryThe U.S. greenlighting annexation is a greenlight for China’s abuses
Across the sea from America, a leader who has been in power for more than a decade is laying the groundwork for a land grab. His military was always capable of imposing its wi...
By Coby Goldberg