March 10, 2011

The Uncertain Rise of China's Military

By Abraham M. Denmark

China’s growing defense budget – in addition to its claim of sovereignty in the South China Sea, anti-satellite weapons testing, and interest in cyber military capabilities – has raised questions about the implications of its rising military power, noted Center for a New American Security (CNAS) Fellow Abraham Denmark in congressional testimony to the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission on March 10, 2011. “The question of how China will use its newfound power, especially its military power, will determine the course of the 21st century,” said Denmark. 

“China is adopting diplomatic positions and developing a robust military capability that combined could undermine American power projection capabilities," said Denmark. "This may, at a more fundamental level, undermine the same liberal international order that has to date enabled China’s rise. Yet China’s future path is not determined, and the development of a robust Chinese military capability does not inherently threaten the United States or the liberal international order."

Denmark argued that the key for American strategists and policymakers is to understand the present ambiguity surrounding China's military, and build a strategy that encourages a more responsible and productive future for Chinese power while defending American interests against the potential for Chinese aggression. In his testimony, Denmark recommends that the United States:

  • Encourage China’s positive contribution to global public goods and find opportunities for cooperation between the U.S. military and the People's Liberation Army.
  • Work with ASEAN regarding the South China Sea to develop a common, clear message to send to Beijing about what is, and what is not, acceptable behavior.
  • React strongly and decisively when China’s actions violate American interests, undermine global public goods, or threaten regional stability.
  • Continue to adjust its military capabilities to counter China’s anti-access area denial capabilities.
  • Build the military capacities of its allies and partners throughout the Asia-Pacific and identify new partners in the region.

Download China's Arrival: A Strategic Framework for a Global Relationship, a CNAS report co-authored by Denmark, here.

Find out more about the CNAS Asia-Pacific Security Program.

  • Reports
    • October 7, 2021
    Tangled Threats

    Executive Summary China and North Korea pose intertwined challenges for U.S. and allied policy. The Korean Peninsula constitutes just one area among many in U.S.-China relatio...

    By Jacob Stokes

  • Commentary
    • The Washington Post
    • September 22, 2021
    The Biden administration just stalled China’s advance in the Indo-Pacific

    Australia, by intensifying the military competition with China, could tee up a chain of as yet unforeseen events....

    By Robert D. Kaplan

  • Commentary
    • Asia Times
    • September 11, 2021
    China tariff policies flounder without a strategy

    The White House ought to be asking a series of questions. What problem are we responding to? What are we trying to achieve? How will 301s and tariffs further that?...

    By Van Jackson

  • Commentary
    • Inkstick
    • September 9, 2021
    Neoliberals, Anti-imperialists, and the China Question

    If there are arguments to be made in favor of cooperation with China, or to justify not sweating China’s accumulation of power, they’re probably best made on grounds other tha...

    By Van Jackson

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia