In Military Campaigns: Veterans' Endorsements and Presidential Elections, published by the Center for a New American Security, experts Dr. James Golby, Assistant Professor at the United States Military Academy; Kyle Dropp, Ph.D. candidate in Political Science at Stanford University; and Dr. Peter Feaver, Professor of Political Science and Public Policy at Duke University, examine whether military endorsements impact a campaign's ability to secure votes. The authors conclude that military endorsements are significant, but only in a close race. Moreover, they conclude that military endorsements may have unintended consequences on the public's perception of the military as a nonpartisan entity.
If You Want Peace, Prepare for Nuclear War
By Elbridge Colby
What should be done with report on military sexual harassment and assault?
By Kayla M. Williams
Why ROTC is the overlooked tool to challenge the civil-military divide
By Emma Moore
Leveraging ROTC to Span the Civil-Military Gap
By Emma Moore & Andrew Swick