Image credit: U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Benjamin Crossley.

June 15, 2017

Toward an “Open Source” Maritime Force Structure

By Nicholas C. Prime

The U.S. Navy’s updated Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower outlines several key themes and areas of development for the sea services as they continue the transition from the focus on the land wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Some are new, a few are traditional, and several provide an interesting perspective on previously gestating concepts. One item of particular interest, and the focus herein, is the call to “expand the practice of employing adaptive force packages, which tailor naval capabilities to specific regional environments.” This seems like something that should be fairly intuitive, something that should evolve naturally as the sea services adapt to new and challenging circumstances. However, the argument here is meant to suggest something broader, a more conceptual rethink of how the maritime services, collectively, develop and deploy force structure packages. In short, all three maritime services should work toward the creation of an integrated, open framework for force development and deployment. A framework which replaces the practice of haphazard or incoherent deployment of assets, deployments with little or no connection between platforms deployed and overarching strategic aims. Abandoning a practice that indelicately pushes standardized—one size fits most—force packages into meeting unique operational requirements, and instead develop a system that identifies operational requirements and allows the relevant services (even when acting in concert with partner nations) to more precisely match particular capabilities to unique operational requirements.

An open source framework that incorporates the entire panoply of American maritime assets could radically improve the ability of service and theater commanders to make the most of available resources in responding to the necessities of policy and operational planning. At the same time, such a framework would translate the nuts and bolts of operational planning into a strategy-driven budgetary and policymaking process. Breaking the often-bemoaned cycle of budget planning driving strategy, the two would essentially become mutually reinforcing.

The full report is available online.

Download PDF

  1. “U.S. Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower 2015 Revision,” USNI News, March 13, 2015, https://news.usni.org/2015/03/13/document-u-s-cooperative-strategy-for-21st-century-seapower-2015-revision.
  2. Ibid., 11.

Authors

  • Nicholas C. Prime

  • Commentary
    • Foreign Affairs
    • March 17, 2023
    The Surprising Success of U.S. Military Aid to Ukraine

    Ukraine’s military has defied expectations in its war with Russia, and many analysts attribute its success to U.S. help. But the mere fact of receiving aid is no guarantee of ...

    By Rachel Tecott & Polina Beliakova

  • Podcast
    • February 23, 2023
    Defense & Aerospace Air Power Podcast with Stacie Pettyjohn and Becca Wasser

    On this week’s episode of the Defense & Aerospace Report Air Power podcast, co-hosts Vago Muradian and JJ Gertler review the air war in Ukraine one year into the conflict with...

    By Stacie Pettyjohn & Becca Wasser

  • Reports
    • February 22, 2023
    Avoiding the Brink

    The United States is entering an unprecedented multipolar nuclear era that is far more complex and challenging than that of the Cold War. This report examines potential trigge...

    By Stacie Pettyjohn & Hannah Dennis

  • Podcast
    • February 22, 2023
    DEFAERO Strategy Series with CNAS' Richard Fontaine

    On this latest episode of the Defense & Aerospace Report Strategy Series, Richard Fontaine, the president and CEO of the Center for a New American Security, discusses key take...

    By Richard Fontaine

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia