Many experts say the industrial-era personnel system still in use by the Pentagon -- with its up-or-out promotions, its non-vesting pension system for the first 20 years, and its decrepit means of evaluating officers -- was perfect for World War II. But now that we have an all-volunteer force reliant on skilled people who often can find work elsewhere, is the current system the best way to maintain the world's best military? John Nagl of the Center for a New American Security and your Battleland correspondent tussle with the issue, with help from Dave Barno, a retired Army lieutenant general, and Nora Bansahel, a former Rand Corp. military strategist now at CNAS.
The Mission Creep of Sending Troops To The US-Mexico Border
By Emma Moore
Changing Tides in the Sea of Goodwill: A Financial Analysis of Veteran-Serving Nonprofits
By Douglas McCormick, Emma Moore & Andrew Swick
If You Want Peace, Prepare for Nuclear War
By Elbridge Colby
What should be done with report on military sexual harassment and assault?
By Kayla M. Williams