May 14, 2018

Combat High

America's addiction to war

By Dr. Jason Dempsey

Afew months before the United States invaded Iraq, in 2003, Donald Rumsfeld, the defense secretary at the time, was asked on a radio show how long the war would take. “Five days or five weeks or five months,” he replied. “It certainly isn’t going to last any longer than that.” When George W. Bush departed the White House more than five years later, there were nearly 136,000 US soldiers stationed in the country. 

The number of troops has fallen since then, but Bush’s successors have failed to withdraw the United States from the region. Barack Obama campaigned on ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, only to send hundreds of troops into Syria. For years Donald Trump described America’s efforts in Afghanistan as “a waste” and said that soldiers were being led “to slaughter,” but in 2017 he announced that he would deploy as many as 4,000 more troops to the country. “Decisions are much different when you sit behind the desk of the Oval Office,” he explained. Every president, it seems, eventually learns to embrace our perpetual war.

With the Trump Administration’s attacks on affordable health care, immigration, environmental regulation, and civil rights now in full swing, criticism of America’s military engagements has all but disappeared from the national conversation. Why hasn’t the United States been able—or willing—to end these conflicts? Who has benefited from them? Is victory still possible—and, if so, is it anywhere in sight?

Read the Full Article at Harper's Magazine

  • Commentary
    • Inkstick
    • April 2, 2021
    How Zoom has Reduced Barriers to Entry in National Security

    The shift to the virtual environment assists those who may have been overlooked in the past....

    By Katherine L. Kuzminski

  • Commentary
    • INKSTICK
    • March 12, 2021
    The Trans Ban Is Gone but More Needs To Be Done

    Simply lifting the ban isn’t enough to counteract the discrimination transgender service members and veterans continue to face....

    By Nathalie Grogan

  • Commentary
    • March 3, 2021
    Sharper: Civil-Military Relations

    The so-called “civil-military divide” has increasingly defined the relationship between America's civil society and its armed forces....

    By Cole Stevens, Nathalie Grogan & Chris Estep

  • Commentary
    • February 17, 2021
    Sharper: National Security's Next Generation

    The need to amplify new and diverse voices in national security policymaking has never been clearer....

    By Chris Estep, Ainikki Riikonen & Cole Stevens

View All Reports View All Articles & Multimedia