September 19, 2024
Competition, Not Control, is Key to Winning the Global AI Race
The United States, with much of the world’s AI-enabling infrastructure, has positioned itself as the global leader in AI innovation. That might not be the case for much longer. China continues to develop state-of-the-art AI systems, despite an extensive network of U.S. and allied export controls aimed at curtailing China’s technical progress. Beijing is expanding and accelerating new investments in AI and investing significant government resources into supporting its emerging domestic technology base. The result: global AI competition has now become synonymous with U.S.-China competition.
As the United States fights to maintain technological primacy, policymakers are enacting and considering new export controls to limit China’s access to the necessary components for building advanced AI systems, such as American-developed state-of-the-art models, semiconductors, and computational power.
If the United States fails to change course from an AI strategy based on control, not geopolitical competition, it will quickly find itself at a strategic disadvantage – with adversarial nations filling the void.
Getting export controls right is notoriously difficult. Not long after the United States passed its expansive export controls targeting China’s access to AI-relevant semiconductors in October 2022, cracks in the effectiveness of these controls appeared. In response, China increased investment in its domestic semiconductor manufacturing capabilities intending to achieve self-sufficiency. Markets, too, responded to these controls with successful smuggling efforts, pouring controlled chips into the PRC. Firms like NVIDIA diligently retooled products to route sales around legal strictures. For tangible goods such as semiconductors, the success of export controls has proved challenging.
Read the full article from Just Security.
More from CNAS
-
Commentary
Indo-Pacific Security / Technology & National Security
Sharper: Securing Critical InfrastructureThe systems that keep global society running are increasingly in adversaries’ sights. From sabotage on the subsea cables that enable global connectivity to missile attacks on ...
By Charles Horn
-
CNAS Insights
Technology & National Security
CNAS Insights | A Closing Door on Open Weights? Implications for AI SovereigntyEarlier this month, Beijing announced draft export controls that signaled a potential shift in its longtime embrace of open-weight models. Foreign capitals and corporations sh...
By Vivek Chilukuri
-
Podcast
Technology & National Security
U.S. Military Forges Ahead on Autonomous WeaponryPaul Scharre joins All Things Considered to discuss the use of autonomous weapons in the U.S. military. Listen to the full interview on All Things Considered....
By Paul Scharre
-
Commentary
Technology & National Security
Explainer: How the Trump Administration is Aiming to ‘Modernize’ U.S. SanctionsTo successfully engage the private sector, civil society, and foreign governments, the administration needs to articulate its sanctions modernization efforts in greater detail...
By Alex Zerden
