August 15, 2025
America Should Rent, Not Sell, AI Chips to China
This article was originally published on RAND.
President Trump announced Monday that Nvidia will pay the U.S. government 15 percent of the revenue it derives from sales of its H20 chip to China—an unusual arrangement that gives up leverage. The United States could do better: Rather than selling AI chips, the United States should instead rent them to China to permanently maintain its AI chip edge.
Controversy surrounding NVIDIA's China-specific H20 AI chip has reignited debate over chip exports to China. Proponents of H20 exports argue that sales keep China dependent on U.S. technology while generating revenue. They claim denying access would only accelerate China's drive for homegrown alternatives. These arguments miss a superior alternative to selling chips that would yield similar benefits to the United States: providing China with the computing power it seeks for a fee via remote cloud access
Selling AI chips to China outright reduces America's AI lead for little benefit.
When the United States sells chips, they're gone forever—disappearing into data centers with unknown users pursuing unknown goals. There's another option: give users the computing power of chips remotely. Cloud services offer almost everything chip sales promise, plus actual control: access can be shut off at any stage (PDF) as geopolitical conditions change or threats arise. The economics are better too. AI chips are sold to U.S. cloud providers, who generate additional revenue by renting AI chips to China—creating two revenue streams instead of one. Companies like Amazon and Microsoft already serve global customers this way, maintaining physical possession of the chips while providing computational power on demand.
Unlike physical chip exports, cloud access makes it significantly harder for customers to redirect access to unauthorized parties. Know-your-customer requirements enable monitoring for connections to Chinese military entities. Cloud access also creates continuous leverage—every renewal becomes a negotiation opportunity, compared to chips that get replaced only every three to four years.
Read the full article on RAND.
More from CNAS
-
Technology & National Security
Jensen Huang's Exit: What It Means For Nvidia And America's AI SecurityWhat does Jensen Huang's exit mean for Nvidia, and could the controversy have wider implications for America's AI leadership and national security? Speaking to NDTV, Vivek Chi...
By Vivek Chilukuri
-
Energy, Economics & Security / Technology & National Security
CNAS Insights | The Nvidia Scandal Is a Wake-Up Call for CongressNvidia founder and CEO Jensen Huang has resigned amid revelations of extramarital affairs, including with an alleged Chinese spy. The suspected Chinese asset, Alice Huang, has...
By Emily Kilcrease & Vivek Chilukuri
-
Technology & National Security
Jensen Huang latest: Scandal-hit Nvidia founder asked to testify to Senate - as details of Trump call emergeJensen Huang's resignation was "inevitable" following the affair allegations and while it will be hard for Nvidia in the short term, they still have the best chips in the worl...
By Vivek Chilukuri
-
Technology & National Security
China’s AI Diplomacy Is WorkingIf the United States wants to maintain its lead and make meaningful progress on safety, it needs to treat the dialogue as part of the competition with China....
By Daniel Remler
