The potential international effects of a domestic decryption mandate have been a significant factor in the debate over U.S. encryption policy. Some fear that a U.S. decryption mandate would empower authoritarian regimes and would clash with the United States’ international Internet-freedom agenda.
Unfortunately, the debate over encryption policy’s international effects has been conducted principally in ideological terms rather than on the basis of observable facts and fact-based predictions about future developments. This paper proposes key questions to stimulate and guide a more factually informed debate. It also offers several recommendations for shifting the debate onto sounder empirical terrain.
To read the full essay, visit the Hoover Institution website.
More from CNAS
PodcastStories from the Backchannel: Season Two Trailer
Now more than ever, Americans are interested in the people working behind the scenes on consequential national security decisions. In Season Two of Stories from the Backchanne...
By Ilan Goldenberg, Richard Fontaine, Susanna V. Blume, Kayla M. Williams, Price B. Floyd, Kurt Campbell & Kara Frederick
CommentaryUpending the 5G Status Quo with Open Architecture
This article is adapted in part from written testimony the author submitted to the Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. ...
By Martijn Rasser
VideoKara Frederick Discusses Data Privacy on Fox & Friends
Kara Frederick joins Fox & Friends First to discuss the role of data privacy protections for American patients. Listen to the full conversation and more on Fox News....
By Kara Frederick
VideoUS launches national security review of TikTok over data collection and censorship concerns
Kara Frederick previews her testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee on the Chinese-owned TikTok app. Listen to the full conversation and more on Fox News....
By Kara Frederick